SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts (Second Edition)

1. Introduction

SOAP Version 1.2 (SOAP) is a lightweight protocol intended for exchange of structured information in a decentralized, distributed environment. The SOAP specification consists of three parts. Part 2 (this document) defines a set of adjuncts that MAY be used with the SOAP messaging framework:

The SOAP Data Model represents application-defined data structures and values as a directed, edge-labeled graph of nodes (see 2. SOAP Data Model).
The SOAP Encoding defines a set of rules for encoding instances of data that conform to the SOAP Data Model for inclusion in SOAP messages (see 3. SOAP Encoding).
The SOAP RPC Representation defines a convention for how to use the SOAP Data Model for representing RPC calls and responses (see 4. SOAP RPC Representation).
The section for describing features and bindings defines a convention for describing features and binding in terms of properties and property values (see 5. A Convention for Describing Features and Bindings).
The section on SOAP-Supplied Message Exchange Patterns and Features defines a request response message exchange pattern and a message exchange pattern supporting non-SOAP requests for SOAP responses, (see 6. SOAP-Supplied Message Exchange Patterns and Features).
The SOAP Web Method feature defines a feature for control of methods used on the World Wide Web (see 6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature).
The SOAP HTTP Binding defines a binding of SOAP to HTTP (see [RFC 2616]) following the rules of the SOAP Protocol Binding Framework, [SOAP Part 1] (see 7. SOAP HTTP Binding).

SOAP 1.2 Part 0 [SOAP Part 0] is a non-normative document intended to provide an easily understandable tutorial on the features of the SOAP Version 1.2 specifications.

SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] defines the SOAP messaging framework.

Note:

In previous versions of this specification the SOAP name was an acronym. This is no longer the case.

1.1 Notational Conventions

The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC 2119].

This specification uses a number of namespace prefixes throughout; they are listed in Table 1. Note that the choice of any namespace prefix is arbitrary and not semantically significant (see XML Infoset [XML InfoSet]).

Table 1: Prefixes and Namespaces used in this specification
Prefix	Namespace	Notes
env	"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"	Defined by SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1].
enc	"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding"	A normative XML Schema [XML Schema Part 1], [XML Schema Part 2] document for the "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding" namespace can be found at http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding.
rpc	"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-rpc"	A normative XML Schema [XML Schema Part 1], [XML Schema Part 2] document for the "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-rpc" namespace can be found at http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-rpc.
xs	"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"	Defined in the W3C XML Schema specification [XML Schema Part 1], [XML Schema Part 2].
xsi	"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"	Defined in the W3C XML Schema specification [XML Schema Part 1], [XML Schema Part 2].

Namespace names of the general form "http://example.org/..." and "http://example.com/..." represent application or context-dependent URIs (see RFC ~~2396~~3986 [RFC ~~2396]~~3986]).

This specification uses the Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF) as described in XML 1.0 [XML 1.0].

With the exception of examples and sections explicitly marked as "Non-Normative", all parts of this specification are normative.

2. SOAP Data Model

The SOAP Data Model represents application-defined data structures and values as a directed edge-labeled graph of nodes. Components of this graph are described in the following sections.

The purpose of the SOAP Data Model is to provide a mapping of non-XML based data to some wire representation. It is important to note that use of the SOAP Data Model, the accompanying SOAP Encoding (see 3. SOAP Encoding), and/or the SOAP RPC Representation (see 4. SOAP RPC Representation) is OPTIONAL. Applications which already model data in XML may not need to use the SOAP Data Model. Due to their optional nature, it is NOT a requirement to implement the SOAP Data Model, the SOAP Encoding and/or the SOAP RPC Representation as part of a SOAP node.

2.1 Graph Edges

Edges in the graph are said to originate at a graph node and terminate at a graph node. An edge that originates at a graph node is known as an outbound edge with respect to that graph node. An edge that terminates at a graph node is known as an inbound edge with respect to that graph node. An edge MAY originate and terminate at the same graph node. An edge MAY have only an originating graph node, that is be outbound only. An edge MAY have only a terminating graph node, that is be inbound only.

The outbound edges of a given graph node MAY be distinguished by label or by position. Position is a total order on such edges; thus, if any outbound edges from a given node are distinguished by position, then all outbound edges from that node are so distinguished.

2.1.1 Edge labels

An edge label is an XML qualified name. Two edge labels are equal if and only if their XML expanded names are equal. ~~I.e.~~I.e., both of the following are true:

Their local name values are the same.
Either of the following is true:
1. Both of their namespace name values are missing.
2. Their namespace name values are both present and are both the same.

See 2.3 Values for uses of edge labels and position to distinguish the members of encoded values, and XML Schema [XML Schema Part 2] for more information about comparing XML qualified names.

2.2 Graph Nodes

A graph node has zero or more outbound edges. A graph node that has no outbound edges has an optional lexical value. All graph nodes have an optional type name of type xs:QName in the namespace named "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" (see XML Schema [XML Schema Part 2]).

2.2.1 Single and Multi Reference Nodes

A graph node may be single reference or multi reference. A single reference graph node has a single inbound edge. A multi reference graph node has multiple inbound edges.

2.3 Values

A simple value is represented as a graph node with a lexical value.

A compound value is represented as a graph node with zero or more outbound edges as follows:

A graph node whose outbound edges are distinguished solely by their labels is known as a "struct". The outbound edges of a struct MUST be labeled with distinct names (see 2.1.1 Edge labels).
A graph node whose outbound edges are distinguished solely by position is known as an "array". The outbound edges of an array MUST NOT be labeled.

3. SOAP Encoding

SOAP Encoding provides a means of encoding instances of data that conform to the data model described in 2. SOAP Data Model. This encoding MAY be used to transmit data in SOAP header blocks and/or SOAP bodies. Other data models, alternate encodings of the SOAP Data Model as well as unencoded data MAY also be used in SOAP messages (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1], SOAP encodingStyle Attribute for specification of alternative encoding styles and see 4. SOAP RPC Representation for restrictions on data models and encodings used to represent SOAP Remote Procedure Calls (RPC)).

The serialization rules defined in this section are identified by the URI "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding". SOAP messages using this particular serialization SHOULD indicate that fact by using the SOAP encodingStyle attribute information item (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP encodingStyle Attribute).

3.1 Mapping between XML and the SOAP Data Model

XML allows very flexible encoding of data. SOAP Encoding defines a narrower set of rules for encoding the graphs described in 2. SOAP Data Model. This section defines the encoding at a high level, and the subsequent sub-sections describe the encoding rules in more detail. The encodings described in this section can be used in conjunction with the mapping of RPC requests and responses specified in 4. SOAP RPC Representation.

The encodings are described below from the perspective of a de-serializer. In each case, the presence of an XML serialization is presumed, and the mapping to a corresponding graph is described.

More than one encoding is typically possible for a given graph. When serializing a graph for transmission inside a SOAP message, a representation that deserializes to the identical graph MUST be used; when multiple such representations are possible, any of them MAY be used. When receiving an encoded SOAP message, all representations MUST be accepted.

3.1.1 Encoding Graph Edges and Nodes

Each graph edge is encoded as an element information item and each element information item represents a graph edge. 3.1.3 Encoding Compound Values describes the relationship between edge labels and the [local name] and [namespace name] properties of such element information items.

The graph node at which an edge terminates is determined by examination of the serialized XML as follows:

If the element information item representing the edge does not have a ref attribute information item (see 3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item) among its attributes then that element information item is said to represent a node in the graph and the edge terminates at that node. In such cases the element information item represents both a graph edge and a graph node
If the element information item representing the edge does have a ref attribute information item (see 3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item) among its attributes, then the value of that attribute information item MUST be identical to the value of exactly one id attribute information item ( see 3.1.5.1 id Attribute Information Item) in the same envelope. In this case the edge terminates at the graph node represented by the element information item on which the id attribute information item appears. That element information item MUST be in the scope of an encodingStyle attribute with a value of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding" (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1], SOAP encodingStyle Attribute).

All nodes in the graph are encoded as described in 1 above. Additional inbound edges for multi reference graph nodes are encoded as described in 2 above.

3.1.2 Encoding Simple Values

The lexical value of a graph node representing a simple value is the sequence of Unicode characters identified by the character information item children of the element information item representing that node. The element information item representing a simple value node MAY have among its attributes a 'nodeType' attribute information item (see 3.1.7 nodeType Attribute Information Item). Note that certain Unicode characters cannot be represented in XML (see XML 1.0 [XML 1.0]).

3.1.3 Encoding Compound Values

An outbound edge of a graph node is encoded as an element information item child of the element information item that represents the node (see 3.1.1 Encoding Graph Edges and Nodes). Particular rules apply depending on what kind of compound value the graph node represents. These rules are as follows:

For a graph edge which is distinguished by label, the [local name] and [namespace name] properties of the child element information item together determine the value of the edge label.
For a graph edge which is distinguished by position:
- The ordinal position of the graph edge corresponds to the position of the child element information item relative to its siblings
- The [local name] and [namespace name] properties of the child element information item are not significant.
The element information item representing a compound value node MAY have among its attributes a nodeType attribute information item (see 3.1.7 nodeType Attribute Information Item).
The following rules apply to the encoding of a graph node that represents an "array":
- The element information item representing an array node MAY have among its attributes an itemType attribute information item (see 3.1.4.1 itemType Attribute Information Item).
- The element information item representing an array node MAY have among its attributes an arraySize attribute information item (see 3.1.6 arraySize Attribute Information Item).
If a graph edge does not terminate in a graph node then it can either be omitted from the serialization or it can be encoded as an element information item with an xsi:nil attribute information item whose value is "true".

3.1.4 Computing the Type Name Property

The type name property of a graph node is a {namespace name, local name} pair computed as follows:

If the element information item representing the graph node has an xsi:type attribute information item among its attributes then the type name property of the graph node is the value of the xsi:type attribute information item.

Note:

This attribute is of type xs:QName (see XML Schema [XML Schema Part 2]); its value consists of the pair {namespace name, local name}. Neither the prefix used to construct the QName nor any information relating to any definition of the type is considered to be part of the value. The SOAP graph carries only the qualified name of the type.
Otherwise if the parent element information item of the element information item representing the graph node has an enc:itemType attribute information item (see 3.1.4.1 itemType Attribute Information Item) among its attributes then the type name property of the graph node is the value of the enc:itemType attribute information item
Otherwise the value of the type name property of the graph node is unspecified.

Note:

These rules define how the type name property of a graph node in a graph is computed from a serialized encoding. This specification does not mandate validation using any particular schema language or type system. Nor does it include built in types or provide any standardized faults to reflect value/type name conflicts.

However, nothing prohibits development of additional specifications to describe the use of SOAP Encoding with particular schema languages or type systems. Such additional specifications MAY mandate validation using particular schema language, and MAY specify faults to be generated if validation fails. Such additional specifications MAY specify augmentations to the deserialized graph based on information determined from such a validation. The use by SOAP Encoding of xsi:type is intended to facilitate integration with the W3C XML Schema language (see C. Using W3C XML Schema with SOAP Encoding). Other XML based schema languages, data schemas and programmatic type systems MAY be used but only to the extent that they are compatible with the serialization described in this specification.

3.1.4.1 itemType Attribute Information Item

The itemType attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

A [local name] of itemType .
A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding".
A [specified] property with a value of "true".

The type of the itemType attribute information item is xs:QName. The value of the itemType attribute information item is used to compute the type name property (see 3.1.4 Computing the Type Name Property) of members of an array.

3.1.5 Unique identifiers

3.1.5.1 id Attribute Information Item

The id attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

A [local name] of id .
A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding".
A [specified] property with a value of "true".

The type of the id attribute information item is xs:ID. The value of the id attribute information item is a unique identifier that can be referred to by a ref attribute information item (see 3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item).

3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item

The ref attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

A [local name] of ref .
A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding".
A [specified] property with a value of "true".

The type of the ref attribute information item is xs:IDREF. The value of the ref attribute information item is a reference to a unique identifier defined by an id attribute information item (see 3.1.5.1 id Attribute Information Item).

3.1.5.3 Constraints on id and ref Attribute Information Items

The value of a ref attribute information item MUST also be the value of exactly one id attribute information item.

A ref attribute information item and an id attribute information item MUST NOT appear on the same element information item.

3.1.6 arraySize Attribute Information Item

The arraySize attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

A [local name] of arraySize .
A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding".

The type of the arraySize attribute information item is enc:arraySize. The value of the arraySize attribute information item MUST conform to the following EBNF grammar

~~[1]~~ [1]	`arraySizeValue`	~~::=~~ ::=	`("" \| concreteSize) nextConcreteSize`
~~[2]~~ [2]	`nextConcreteSize`	~~::=~~ ::=	`whitespace concreteSize`
~~[3]~~ [3]	`concreteSize`	~~::=~~ ::=	`[0-9]+`
~~[4]~~ [4]	`white space`	~~::=~~ ::=	`(#x20 \| #x9 \| #xD \| #xA)+`

The ~~array's~~ ~~dimensions~~ ~~are~~ ~~represented~~ by ~~each~~ ~~item~~ in ~~the~~ ~~list~~arraySize attribute conveys a suggested mapping of ~~sizes~~ ~~(unspecified~~ ~~size~~ in ~~case~~ of ~~the~~ ~~asterisk).~~a SOAP array to a multi-dimensional program data structure. The ~~number~~cardinality of ~~items~~ inthe arraySize list represents the number of ~~dimensions~~ indimensions, with individual values providing the ~~array.~~ ~~The~~ ~~asterisk,~~ if ~~present,~~ ~~MUST~~extents of the respective dimensions. When SOAP encoding multidimensional arrays, nodes are selected such that the last subscript (i.e., the subscript corresponding to the last specified dimension) varies most rapidly, and so on with the first varying most slowly. An asterisk MAY be used only ~~appear~~in place of the first ~~position~~size to indicate a dimension of unspecified extent; asterisks MUST NOT appear in other positions in the list. The default value of the arraySize attribute information item is "*", ~~that~~ is by ~~default~~ ~~arrays~~ ~~are~~ ~~considered~~ to ~~have~~i.e., a single dimension of unspecified ~~size.~~extent.

3.1.7 nodeType Attribute Information Item

The nodeType attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

A [local name] of nodeType .
A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-encoding".
A [specified] property with a value of "true".

The type of the nodeType attribute information item is enc:nodeType.

The value of the nodeType attribute information item MUST, if present, be one of the strings "simple" or "struct" or "array". The value indicates what kind of a value this node represents - a simple value, a compound struct value or a compound array value respectively.

3.2 Decoding Faults

During deserialization a SOAP receiver:

SHOULD generate an "env:Sender" SOAP fault with a subcode of enc:MissingID if the message contains a ref attribute information item but no corresponding id attribute information item (see 3.1.5.3 Constraints on id and ref Attribute Information Items).
SHOULD generate an "env:Sender" SOAP fault with a subcode of enc:DuplicateID if the message contains two or more id attribute information item that have the same value. (see 3.1.5.3 Constraints on id and ref Attribute Information Items).
MAY generate an "env:Sender" SOAP fault with a subcode of enc:UntypedValue if the type name property of an encoded graph node is unspecified.

4. SOAP RPC Representation

One of the design goals of SOAP is to facilitate the exchange of messages that map conveniently to definitions and invocations of ~~method~~methods and ~~procedure~~ ~~calls~~procedures in commonly used programming languages. For that purpose, this section defines a uniform representation of remote procedure call (RPC) requests and responses. It does not define actual mappings to any particular programming language. The representation is entirely ~~platform~~ ~~independent~~platform-independent and considerable effort has been made to encourage usage that is consistent with the Web in general.

As mentioned in section 2. SOAP Data Model, use and implementation of the SOAP RPC Representation is OPTIONAL.

The SOAP encodingStyle attribute information item (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP encodingStyle Attribute) is used to indicate the encoding style of the RPC representation. The encoding thus specified MUST support the 2. SOAP Data Model. The encoding style defined in 3. SOAP Encoding supports such constructs and is therefore suitable for use with the SOAP RPC Representation.

This SOAP RPC Representation is not predicated on any SOAP protocol binding. When SOAP is bound to HTTP, an RPC invocation maps naturally to an HTTP request and an RPC response maps to an HTTP response. (see 7. SOAP HTTP Binding). However, the SOAP RPC Representation is not limited to the SOAP HTTP Binding.

To invoke an RPC, the following information is needed:

The address of the target SOAP node.
A procedure or method name.
The identities and values of any arguments to be passed to the procedure or method. Arguments used to identify Web resources SHOULD be distinguished from those representing data or control information (see 4.1.1 Identification of RPC Resources.)
Values for properties as required by any features of the binding to be used. For example, "GET" or "POST" for the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method property of the 6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature.
Optional header data.

SOAP RPC relies on the protocol binding to provide a mechanism for carrying the URI of the target SOAP node. For HTTP the request URI indicates the resource against which the invocation is being made. Other than requiring it to be a valid URI, SOAP places no restriction on the form of an identifier (see RFC ~~2396~~3986 [RFC ~~2396]~~3986] for more information on URIs). The section 4.1.1 Identification of RPC Resources further discusses the use of URIs for identifying RPC resources.

The SOAP RPC Representation employs the 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern and 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern. Use of the SOAP RPC Representation with other MEPs MAY be possible, but is beyond the scope of this specification.

4.1 Use of RPC on the World Wide Web

The following guidelines SHOULD be followed when deploying SOAP RPC applications on the World Wide Web.

4.1.1 Identification of RPC Resources

The World Wide Web identifies resources with URIs, but common programming conventions convey identification information in the arguments to procedures, or in the names of those procedures. For example, the call:

updateQuantityInStock(PartNumber="123", NewQuantity="200")

suggests that the resource to be updated is the QuantityInStock for PartNumber "123". Accordingly, when mapping to or from a programming language method or ~~procedure~~ ~~call,~~procedure, any arguments that serve to identify resources (such as the part number above) should when practical be represented in the URI to which the SOAP message is addressed. When mapping to or from a programming language method or ~~procedure~~ ~~call,~~procedure, the name of which identifies or qualifies the identification of a resource (such as QuantityInStock above), such naming or qualification should when practical be represented in the URI to which the SOAP message is addressed. No standard means of representation of arguments or method names is provided by this specification.

Note:

Conventions for specific URI encodings of procedure names and arguments, as well as for controlling the inclusion of such arguments in the SOAP RPC body could be established in conjunction with the development of Web Service interface description languages. They could be developed when SOAP is bound to particular programming languages or could be established on an ~~application~~application- or procedure-specific basis.

4.1.2 Distinguishing Resource Retrievals from other RPCs

The World Wide Web depends on mechanisms that optimize commonly performed information retrieval tasks. Specifically, protocols such as HTTP [RFC 2616] provide a GET method which is used to perform safe retrievals, ~~i.e.~~i.e., to perform retrievals that are idempotent, free of side effects, and for which security considerations do not preclude the use of cached results or URI-based resource identification.

Certain procedure or method calls represent requests for information retrieval. For example, the call:

getQuantityInStock(PartNumber="123")

might be used to retrieve the quantity established in the example above.

The following conventions can be employed to implement SOAP retrievals and other RPCs on the Web:

The conventions described in 4.1.1 Identification of RPC Resources are used to identify the resource with a URI.
In cases where all the arguments have been represented in the URI, no SOAP header blocks are to be transmitted and the operation is a safe retrieval, the 6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature and the 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern are used. Accordingly, no SOAP envelope is transmitted for the request, and the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method property is set to "GET". The results of the retrieval are a SOAP RPC response as described in 4.2.2 RPC Response
In cases where the operation to be performed is not a retrieval, when SOAP header blocks are to be transmitted (a digital signature, for example), or when a retrieval is not safe, the 6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature and the 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern are used. The request envelope is encoded as described in 4.2.1 RPC Invocation, and the results are as described in 4.2.2 RPC Response. The http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method property is set to "POST".

The SOAP RPC Representation does not define any other value for the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method .

4.2 RPC and SOAP Body

RPC invocations (except for safe retrievals: see 4.1.2 Distinguishing Resource Retrievals from other RPCs) and responses are both carried in the SOAP Body element (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Body) using the following representation:

4.2.1 RPC Invocation

An RPC invocation is modeled as follows:

The invocation is represented by a single struct containing an outbound edge for each [in] or [in/out] parameter. The struct is named identically to the procedure or method ~~name~~and the conventions of B. Mapping ~~Application~~ ~~Defined~~Application-Defined Names to XML Names SHOULD be used to represent method names that are not legal XML names.
Each outbound edge has a label corresponding to the name of the parameter. The conventions of B. Mapping ~~Application~~ ~~Defined~~Application-Defined Names to XML Names SHOULD be used to represent parameter names that are not legal XML names.

Applications MAY process invocations with missing parameters but also MAY fail to process the invocation and return a fault.

4.2.2 RPC Response

An RPC response is modeled as follows:

The response is represented by a single struct containing an outbound edge for the return value and each [out] or [in/out] parameter. The name of the struct is not significant.
Each parameter is represented by an outbound edge with a label corresponding to the name of the parameter. The conventions of B. Mapping ~~Application~~ ~~Defined~~Application-Defined Names to XML Names SHOULD be used to represent parameter names that are not legal XML names.
A non-void return value is represented as follows:
1. There MUST be an outbound edge with a local name of result and a namespace name of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-rpc" which terminates in a terminal node
2. The type of that terminal node is a xs:QName and its value is the name of the outbound edge which terminates in the actual return value.
If the return value of the procedure is void then an outbound edge with a local name of result and a namespace name of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-rpc" MUST NOT be present.
Invocation faults are handled according to the rules in 4.4 RPC Faults. If a protocol binding adds additional rules for fault expression, those MUST also be followed.

4.2.3 SOAP Encoding Restriction

When using SOAP encoding (see 3. SOAP Encoding) in conjunction with the RPC convention described here, the SOAP Body MUST contain only a single child element information item, that child being the serialized RPC invocation or response struct.

4.3 RPC and SOAP Header

Additional information relevant to the encoding of an RPC invocation but not part of the formal procedure or method signature MAY be expressed in a SOAP envelope carrying an RPC invocation or response. Such additional information MUST be expressed as SOAP header blocks.

4.4 RPC Faults

The SOAP RPC Representation introduces additional SOAP fault subcode values to be used in conjunction with the fault codes described in SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Fault Codes.

Errors arising during RPC invocations are reported according to the following rules:

A fault with a Value of Code set to "env:Receiver" SHOULD be generated when the receiver cannot handle the message because of some temporary condition, e.g. when it is out of memory.

Note:

Throughout this document, the term "Value of Code " is used as a shorthand for "value of the Value child element information item of the Code element information item" (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1], SOAP Code Element ).
A fault with a Value of Code set to "env:DataEncodingUnknown" SHOULD be generated when the arguments are encoded in a data encoding unknown to the receiver.
A fault with a Value of Code set to "env:Sender" and a Value of Subcode set to "rpc:ProcedureNotPresent" MAY be generated when the receiver does not support the procedure or method specified.

Note:

Throughout this document, the term "Value of Subcode " is used as a shorthand for "value of the Value child element information item of the Subcode element information item" (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1], SOAP Subcode element).
A fault with a Value of Code set to "env:Sender" and a Value of Subcode set to "rpc:BadArguments" MUST be generated when the receiver cannot parse the arguments or when there is a mismatch in number and/or type of the arguments between what the receiver expects and what was sent.
Other faults arising in an extension or from the application SHOULD be generated as described in SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Fault Codes.

In all cases the values of the Detail and Reason element information items are ~~implementation~~ ~~defined.~~implementation-defined. Details of their use MAY be specified by an external document.

Note:

Senders might receive different faults from those listed above in response to an RPC invocation if the receiver does not support the (optional) RPC convention described here.

5. A Convention for Describing Features and Bindings

This section describes a convention describing Features (including MEPs) and Bindings in terms of properties and property values. The convention is sufficient to describe the distributed states of Feature and Binding specifications as mandated by the Binding Framework (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Protocol Binding Framework) and it is used to describe a Request-Response MEP (see 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern), a Response MEP (see 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern), the SOAP Web Method feature (see 6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature) and the SOAP HTTP Binding (see 7. SOAP HTTP Binding) elsewhere in this document. Along with the convention itself, an informal model is defined that describes how properties propagate through a SOAP system. Note that this model is intended to be illustrative only, and is not meant to imply any constraints on the structure or layering of any particular SOAP implementation.

5.1 Model and Properties

In general, a SOAP message is the information that one SOAP node wishes to exchange with another SOAP node according to a particular set of features, including a MEP. In addition, there may be information essential to exchanging a message that is not part of the message itself. Such information is sometimes called message metadata. In the model, the message, any message metadata, and the various information items that enable features are represented as abstractions called properties.

5.1.1 Properties

Under the convention, properties are represented as follows:

Properties are named with URIs.
Where appropriate, property values SHOULD have an XML Schema [XML Schema Part 1] [XML Schema Part 2] type listed in the specification which introduces the property.

5.1.2 Property Scope

Properties within a SOAP node differ in terms of their scope and the origins of their values. As shown in the figure below, we make the distinction between ~~per~~ ~~message-exchange~~per-message-exchange properties and more widely scoped properties by assigning them to different containers called Message Exchange Context and Environment Context respectively. All properties, regardless of their scope, are shared by a SOAP node and a particular Binding.

Figure 1: Model describing properties shared between SOAP and Binding

5.1.2.1 Message Exchange Context

A message exchange context is a collection of properties whose scope is limited to an instance of a given message exchange pattern. An example of a message exchange context property is the identifier of the message exchange pattern in use.

5.1.2.2 Environment Context

The ~~environment~~ ~~context~~Environment Context is a collection of properties whose scope extends beyond an instance of a given message exchange pattern. Examples of ~~environment~~ ~~context~~Environment Context properties are the IP address of the SOAP node or the current date and time.

The values of properties in Environment Context may depend upon local circumstances (as depicted by the external arrow from Environment Context in the figure above). More specifically, the properties in the example could be influenced by an operating system user ID on whose behalf a message exchange is being executed. The mapping of information in a particular implementation to such properties is outside the scope of the binding framework although the abstract representation of such information as properties is not.

5.1.3 Properties and Features

A feature may be expressed through multiple properties and a single property may enable more than one feature. For example, the properties called User ID and Password may be used to enable a feature called Authentication. As a second example, a single property called Message ID could be used to enable one feature called Transaction and a second feature called Message Correlation.

6. SOAP-Supplied Message Exchange Patterns and Features

6.1 Property Conventions for SOAP Message Exchange Patterns

Table 2 describes the properties (in accordance with the property naming conventions defined in this document) that support the description of message exchange patterns (MEPs). Other properties may be involved in the specification of particular MEPs, but the properties in this table are generally applicable to all MEPs.

Property ~~Name~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Description~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Type~~name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Value:The name of the MEP in operation.

Type: xs:anyURI

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason

Value: A value that denotes a ~~pattern~~ ~~specific,~~ ~~binding~~ ~~independent~~pattern-specific, binding-independent reason for the failure of a message exchange. Underlying protocol binding specifications may define properties to convey more ~~binding~~ ~~specific~~binding-specific details of the failure.

Type: xs:anyURI

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

Value:The identifier of the ~~pattern~~ ~~specific~~pattern-specific role of the local SOAP node participating in the message exchange.

Type: xs:anyURI

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State

Value: The identifier of the current state of the message exchange. This value is managed by the binding instance and may be inspected by other entities monitoring the progress of the message exchange.

Type: xs:anyURI

6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern

This section defines the message exchange pattern (MEP) called "Request-Response". The description is an abstract presentation of the operation of this MEP. It is not intended to describe a real implementation or to suggest how a real implementation should be structured.

6.2.1 SOAP Feature Name

This message exchange pattern is identified by the URI (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Features):

"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/"

6.2.2 Description

The SOAP Request-Response MEP defines a pattern for the exchange of a SOAP message acting as a request followed by a ~~SOAP~~message acting as a response. The response message MAY contain a SOAP envelope, or else the response MUST be a binding-specific message indicating that the request has been received. In the absence of failure in the underlying protocol, this MEP consists of exactly two ~~SOAP~~messages.

In the normal operation of a message exchange conforming to the Request-Response MEP, a request message is first transferred from the requesting SOAP node to the responding SOAP node. Following the successful processing of the request message by the responding SOAP node, a response message is transferred from the responding SOAP node to the requesting SOAP node.

Abnormal operation during a Request-Response message exchange might be caused by a failure to transfer the request message, a failure at the responding SOAP node to process the request message, or a failure to transfer the response message. Such failures might be silent at either or both of the requesting and responding SOAP nodes involved, or might result in the generation of a SOAP or binding-specific fault (see 6.2.4 Fault Handling). Also, during abnormal operation each SOAP node involved in the message exchange might differ in its determination of the successful completion of the message exchange.

The scope of a Request-Response MEP is limited to the exchange of a request message and a response message between one requesting and one responding SOAP node. This pattern does not mandate any correlation between multiple requests nor specific timing for multiple requests. Implementations MAY choose to support multiple ongoing requests (and associated response processing) at the same time.

6.2.3 State Machine Description

The Request-Response MEP defines a set of properties described in Table 3.

Property ~~Name~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Description~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Type~~name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage

Value: An abstract structure that represents the current outbound message in the message exchange. This abstracts both SOAP Envelope and any other information structures that are transferred along with the envelope.

Type: Not specified

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage

Value: An abstract structure that represents the current inbound message in the message exchange. This abstracts both SOAP Envelope and any other information structures that are transferred along with the envelope.

Type: Not specified

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination

Value: The identifier of the immediate destination of an outbound message.

Type: xs:anyURI

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateSender

Value: The identifier of the immediate sender of an inbound message.

Type: xs:anyURI

To initiate a message exchange conforming to the Request-Response MEP, the requesting SOAP node instantiates a local message exchange context. Table 4 describes how the context is initialized.

Property ~~Name~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Value~~ ~~Notes~~name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Value: "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/"

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason

Value: "None"

Notes: A relative URI whose base URI is the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

~~"RequestingSOAPNode/"~~Value: "RequestingSOAPNode"

Notes: A relative URI whose base URI is the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State

Value: "Init"

Notes: A relative URI whose base URI is the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage

Value: An abstraction of the request message

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination

Value: An identifier (URI) that denotes the responding SOAP node

There may be other properties related to the operation of the message exchange context instance. Such properties are initialized according to their own feature specifications.

Once the message exchange context is initialized, control of the context is passed to a (conforming) local binding instance.

The diagram below shows the logical state transitions at the requesting and responding SOAP nodes during the lifetime of the message exchange. At each SOAP node, the local binding instance updates (logically) the value of the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ ExchangeContext/State property to reflect the current state of the message exchange. The state names are relative URIs, relative to a base URI value carried in the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ ExchangeContext/Role property of the local message exchange context.

Figure 2: Request-Response MEP State Transition Diagram.

When the local binding instance at the responding SOAP node starts to receive an inbound request message, it (logically) instantiates a message exchange context. Table 5 describes the properties that the binding initializes as part of the context's instantiation.

Property ~~Name~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Value~~ ~~Notes~~name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Value: "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/"

Notes: Initialized as early as possible during the life cycle of the message exchange.

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason

Value: "None"

Notes: A relative URI whose base URI is the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

Value: "RespondingSOAPNode"

Notes: A relative URI whose base URI is the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName . Initialized as early as possible during the life cycle the message exchange.

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State

Value: "Init"

Notes: A relative URI whose base URI is the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

When the requesting and responding SOAP nodes transition between states, the local binding instance (logically) updates a number of properties. Table 6 and Table 7 describe these updates for the requesting and the responding SOAP nodes, respectively.

CurrentState ~~Transition~~ ~~Condition~~ ~~NextState~~ ~~Action~~

"Init"

Transition Condition: Unconditional

NextState: "Requesting"

Action: Initiate transmission of request message abstracted in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage .

"Requesting"

Transition Condition: Message transmission failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "transmissionFailure"

Transition Condition: Start receiving response message

NextState: "Sending+Receiving"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateSender to denote the sender of the response message (may differ from the values in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination ). Start making an abstraction of the response message available in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage .

"Sending+Receiving"

Transition Condition: Message exchange failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "exchangeFailure"

Transition Condition: Completed sending request message. Completed receiving response message.

NextState: "Success"

Action: If a SOAP envelope is received in the response (I.e., in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage ), then process it according to the SOAP processing model.

CurrentState ~~Transition~~ ~~Condition~~ ~~NextState~~ ~~Action~~

"Init"

Transition Condition: Start receiving request message

NextState: "Receiving"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateSender to denote the sender of the request message (if determinable). Start making an abstraction of the request message available in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage . Pass control of message exchange context to SOAP processor.

"Receiving"

Transition Condition: Message reception failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "receptionFailure".

Transition Condition: Start of response message available in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage

NextState: "Receiving+Sending"

Action: Initiate transmission of response ~~message~~message. If an envelope is provided in abstracted in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage .then include that in the response message.

"Receiving+Sending"

Transition Condition: Message exchange failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "exchangeFailure".

Transition Condition: Completed receiving request message. Completed sending response message.

NextState: "Success"

Bindings that implement this MEP MAY provide for streaming of SOAP responses. That is, responding SOAP nodes MAY begin transmission of a SOAP response while a SOAP request is still being received and processed. When SOAP nodes implement bindings that support streaming, the following rules apply:

All the rules in SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] Binding Framework regarding streaming of individual SOAP messages MUST be obeyed for both request and response SOAP messages.
When using streaming SOAP bindings, requesting SOAP nodes MUST avoid deadlock by accepting and if necessary processing SOAP response information while the SOAP request is being transmitted.

Note:
Depending on the implementation used and the size of the messages involved, this rule MAY require that SOAP applications stream application-level response processing in parallel with request generation.
A requesting SOAP node MAY enter the "Fail" state, and thus abort transmission of the outbound SOAP request, based on information contained in an incoming streamed SOAP response.

6.2.4 Fault Handling

During the operation of the Request-Response MEP, the participating SOAP nodes may generate SOAP faults.

If a SOAP fault is generated by the responding SOAP node while it is in the "Receiving" state, the SOAP fault is made available in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage and the state machine transitions to the "Receiving+Sending" state.

This MEP makes no claims about the disposition or handling of SOAP faults generated by the requesting SOAP node during any processing of the response message that follows the "Success" state in the requesting SOAP node's state transition table (see Table 6).

6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern

This section defines the message exchange pattern (MEP) called "SOAP Response". The description is an abstract presentation of the operation of this MEP. It is not intended to describe a real implementation or to suggest how a real implementation should be structured.

6.3.1 SOAP Feature Name

This message exchange pattern is identified by the URI (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Features):

"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/"

6.3.2 Description

The SOAP Response MEP defines a pattern for the exchange of a non-SOAP message acting as a request followed by a SOAP message acting as a response. In the absence of failure in the underlying protocol, this MEP consists of exactly two messages, only one of which is a SOAP message:

A request transmitted in a binding-specific manner that does not include a SOAP envelope and hence does not involve any SOAP processing by the receiving SOAP node.
A response message which contains a SOAP envelope. The MEP is completed by the processing of the SOAP envelope following the rules of the SOAP processing model (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1], section SOAP Processing Model).

Abnormal operation during a SOAP Response message exchange might be caused by a failure to transfer the request message or the response message. Such failures might be silent at either or both of the requesting and responding SOAP nodes involved, or might result in the generation of a SOAP or binding-specific fault (see section 6.3.4 Fault Handling). Also, during abnormal operation each SOAP node involved in the message exchange might differ in its determination of the successful completion of the message exchange.

The scope of a SOAP Response MEP is limited to the request for an exchange of a response message between one requesting and one responding SOAP node. This pattern does not mandate any correlation between multiple requests nor specific timing for multiple requests. Implementations MAY choose to support multiple ongoing requests (and associated response processing) at the same time.

Note:

This MEP cannot be used in conjunction with features expressed as SOAP header blocks in the request because there is no SOAP envelope in which to carry them.

6.3.3 State Machine Description

The SOAP Response MEP defines a set of properties described in Table 8.

Table 8: Property definitions for SOAP Response MEP
Property Name	Property Description	Property Type
`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage`	An abstract structure that represents the current outbound message in the message exchange. This abstracts both SOAP Envelope Infoset (which MAY be null) and any other information structures that are transferred along with the envelope.	Not specified
`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage`	An abstract structure that represents the current inbound message in the message exchange. This abstracts both SOAP Envelope Infoset (which MAY be null) and any other information structures that are transferred along with the envelope.	Not specified
`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination`	The identifier of the immediate destination of an outbound message.	xs:anyURI
`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateSender`	The identifier of the immediate sender of an inbound message.	xs:anyURI

To initiate a message exchange conforming to the SOAP Response MEP, the requesting SOAP node instantiates a local message exchange context. Table 9 describes how the context is initialized.

Property ~~Name~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Value~~ ~~Notes~~name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Value: "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/"

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason

Value: "None"

Notes: A relative URI ~~whose~~ ~~base~~ ~~URI~~ isthat will be resolved against the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

Value: "RequestingSOAPNode"

Notes: A relative URI ~~whose~~ ~~base~~ ~~URI~~ isthat will be resolved against the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State

Value: "Init"

Notes: A relative URI whose base URI is the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage

Value: An abstraction of the request message that does not include a SOAP envelope infoset.

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination

Value: An identifier (URI) that denotes the responding SOAP node

There may be other properties related to the operation of the message exchange context instance. Such properties are initialized according to their own feature specifications.

Once the message exchange context is initialized, control of the context is passed to a (conforming) local binding instance.

The diagram below shows the logical state transitions at the requesting and responding SOAP nodes during the lifetime of the message exchange. At each SOAP node, the local binding instance updates (logically) the value of the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State property to reflect the current state of the message exchange. The state names are relative URIs, relative to a Base URI value carried in the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role property of the local message exchange context.

Figure 3: SOAP Response MEP State Transition Diagram

When the local binding instance at the responding SOAP node starts to receive an inbound request message, it (logically) instantiates a message exchange context. Table 10 describes the properties that the binding initializes as part of the context's instantiation.

Property ~~Name~~ ~~Property~~ ~~Value~~ ~~Notes~~name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Value: "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/"

Notes: Initialized as early as possible during the life cycle of the message exchange.

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason

Value: "None"

Notes: A relative URI ~~whose~~ ~~base~~ ~~URI~~ isthat will be resolved against the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

Value: "RespondingSOAPNode"

Notes: A relative URI ~~whose~~ ~~base~~ ~~URI~~ isthat will be resolved against the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName . Initialized as early as possible during the life cycle the message exchange.

Property name: http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State

Value: "Init"

Notes: A relative URI ~~whose~~ ~~base~~ ~~URI~~ isthat will be resolved against the value of ~~http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role~~the property named http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role

When the requesting and responding SOAP nodes transition between states, the local binding instance (logically) updates a number of properties. Table 11 and Table 12 describe these updates for the requesting and the responding SOAP nodes, respectively.

CurrentState ~~Transition~~ ~~Condition~~ ~~NextState~~ ~~Action~~

"Init"

Transition Condition: Unconditional

NextState: "Requesting"

Action: Initiate request

"Requesting"

Transition Condition: Message transmission failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "transmissionFailure"

Transition Condition: Start receiving response message

NextState: "Receiving"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateSender to denote the sender of the response message (may differ from the values in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination ). Start making an abstraction of the response message available in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage .

"Receiving"

Transition Condition: Message exchange failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "exchangeFailure"

Transition Condition: Completed receiving response message.

NextState: "Success"

CurrentState ~~Transition~~ ~~Condition~~ ~~NextState~~ ~~Action~~

"Init"

Transition Condition: Start receiving request

NextState: "Receiving"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateSender to denote the sender of the request message (if determinable). Pass control of message exchange context to SOAP processor.

"Receiving"

Transition Condition: Message reception failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "receptionFailure".

Transition Condition: Start of response message available in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage

NextState: "Sending"

Action: Initiate transmission of response message abstracted in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage .

"Sending"

Transition Condition: Message exchange failure

NextState: "Fail"

Action: Set http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason to "exchangeFailure".

Transition Condition: Completed sending response message.

NextState: "Success"

6.3.4 Fault Handling

During the operation of the SOAP Response MEP, the participating SOAP nodes may generate SOAP faults.

If a SOAP fault is generated by the responding SOAP node while it is in the "Receiving" state, the SOAP fault is made available in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage and the state machine transitions to the "Sending" state.

This MEP makes no claims about the disposition or handling of SOAP faults generated by the requesting SOAP node during any processing of the response message that follows the "Success" state in the requesting SOAP node's state transition table (see Table 11).

6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature

This section defines the "SOAP Web Method Feature".

6.4.1 SOAP Feature Name

The SOAP Web Method feature is identified by the URI (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Features):

"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/"

6.4.2 Description

Underlying protocols designed for use on the World Wide Web provide for manipulation of resources using a small set of Web methods such as GET, PUT, POST, and DELETE. These methods are formally defined in the HTTP specification [RFC 2616], but other underlying protocols might also support them. Bindings to HTTP or such other protocols SHOULD use the SOAP Web Method feature to give applications control over the Web methods to be used when sending a SOAP message.

Bindings supporting this feature SHOULD use the appropriate embodiment of that method if provided by the underlying protocol; for example, the HTTP binding provided with this specification represents the "GET" Web method as an HTTP GET request, and the "POST" method as an HTTP POST request (see 7. SOAP HTTP Binding). Bindings supporting this feature SHOULD provide to the receiving node indication of the Web method used for transmission.

The SOAP Web Method feature MAY be implemented by bindings to underlying transports that have no preferred embodiment of particular Web methods (e.g. do not distinguish GET from POST). Such bindings SHOULD provide to the receiving node indication of the Web method used for transmission, but need take no other action in support of the feature.

6.4.3 SOAP Web Method Feature State Machine

The SOAP Web Method feature defines a single property, which is described in Table 13.

Table 13: Property definition for the SOAP Web Method feature
Property Name	Property Description	Property Type
`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method`	One of "GET", "POST", "PUT", "DELETE" (or others which may subsequently be added to the repertoire of Web methods.)	Not specified

This specification provides for the use of the SOAP Web Method feature in conjunction with the 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern and 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern message exchange patterns. This feature MAY be used with other MEPs if and only if provided for in the specifications of those MEPs.

A node sending a request message MUST provide a value for the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method property. A protocol binding supporting this feature SHOULD set the value of the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method property at the receiving node to match that provided by the sender; the means of transmission for the method property is binding-specific.

A responding node SHOULD respond in a manner consistent with the Web method requested (e.g. a "GET" should result in retrieval of a representation of the identified resource) or SHOULD fault in an application-specific manner if the Web method cannot be supported.

Bindings implementing this feature MUST employ a Message Exchange Pattern with semantics that are compatible with the Web method selected. For example, the SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern (see 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern) is compatible with GET.

6.5 SOAP Action Feature

This section defines the "SOAP Action Feature".

6.5.1 SOAP Feature Name

The SOAP Action feature is identified by the URI (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Features):

"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/action/"

6.5.2 Description

Many SOAP 1.2 underlying protocol bindings will likely utilize the "application/soap+xml" media type (described in A. The application/soap+xml Media Type) to transmit XML serializations of SOAP messages. The media type specifies an optional action ~~parameter~~ ~~(see~~ ~~A.3~~ ~~The~~ ~~action~~ ~~Parameter~~ ),parameter, which can be used to optimize dispatch or routing, among other things. The Action Feature specifies well-known URIs to indicate support for the action parameter in bindings which use MIME, and also to refer to value of the parameter itself.

6.5.3 SOAP Action Feature State Machine

The SOAP Action feature defines a single property, which is described in Table 14. The value of this property MUST be an absolute URI[RFC 3986] and MUST NOT be empty.

Table 14: Property definition for the SOAP Action feature
Property Name	Property Type
`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/action/Action`	`xsd:anyURI`

If the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/action/Action property has a value at a SOAP sender utilizing a binding supporting this feature, the sender MUST use the property value as the value of the action parameter in the media type designator.

Conversely, if a value arrives in the action parameter of the media type designator at a SOAP receiver, the receiver MUST make that value available as the value of the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/action/Action property.

7. SOAP HTTP Binding

7.1 Introduction

The SOAP HTTP Binding provides a binding of SOAP to HTTP. The binding conforms to the SOAP Protocol Binding Framework (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Protocol Binding Framework) and supports the message exchange patterns and features described in 6. SOAP-Supplied Message Exchange Patterns and Features.

7.1.1 Optionality

The SOAP HTTP Binding is optional and SOAP nodes are NOT required to implement it. A SOAP node that correctly and completely implements the SOAP HTTP Binding may to be said to "conform to the SOAP 1.2 HTTP Binding."

The SOAP version 1.2 specification does not preclude development of other bindings to HTTP or bindings to other protocols, but communication with nodes using such other bindings is not a goal. Note that other bindings of SOAP to HTTP MAY be written to provide support for SOAP Message exchange patterns other than 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern or the 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern. Such alternate bindings MAY therefore make use of HTTP features and status codes not required for this binding.

For example, another binding might provide for a 202 or 204 HTTP response status to be returned in response to an HTTP POST or PUT (e.g. a one-way "push" MEP with confirmation).7.1.2 Use of HTTP

The SOAP HTTP binding defines a base URI according to the rules in HTTP/1.1 [RFC 2616]. ~~I.e.~~I.e., the base URI is the HTTP Request-URI or the value of the HTTP Content-Location header field.

This binding of SOAP to HTTP is intended to make appropriate use of HTTP as an application protocol. For example, successful responses are sent with status code ~~200,~~200 or 202, and failures are indicated as 4XX or 5XX. This binding is not intended to fully exploit the features of HTTP, but rather to use HTTP specifically for the purpose of communicating with other SOAP nodes implementing the same binding. Therefore, this HTTP binding for SOAP does not specify the use and/or meaning of all possible HTTP methods, header fields and status responses. It specifies only those which are pertinent to the 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern or the 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern, or which are likely to be introduced by HTTP mechanisms (such as proxies) acting between the SOAP nodes.

Certain optional features provided by this binding depend on capabilities provided by HTTP/1.1, for example content negotiation. Implementations SHOULD thus use HTTP/1.1 [RFC 2616] (or later compatible versions that share the same major version number). Implementations MAY also be deployed using HTTP/1.0, although in this case certain optional binding features may not be provided.

Note:

SOAP HTTP Binding implementations need to account for the fact that HTTP/1.0 intermediaries (which may or may not also be SOAP intermediaries) may alter the representation of SOAP messages, even in situations where both the initial SOAP sender and ultimate SOAP receiver use HTTP/1.1.

7.1.3 Interoperability with non-SOAP HTTP Implementations

Particularly when used with the 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern, the HTTP messages produced by this binding are likely to be indistinguishable from those produced by non-SOAP implementations performing similar operations. Accordingly, some degree of interoperation can be made possible between SOAP nodes and other HTTP implementations when using this binding. For example, a conventional Web server ~~(i.e.~~(i.e., one not written specifically to conform to this specification) might be used to respond to SOAP-initiated HTTP GET's with representations of Content-Type "application/soap+xml". Such interoperation is not a normative feature of this specification.

Even though HTTP often is used on the well-known TCP port 80, the use of HTTP is not limited to that port. As a result, it is possible to have a dedicated HTTP server for handling SOAP processing on a distinct TCP port. Alternatively, it is possible to use a separate virtual host for dealing with SOAP processing. Such configuration, however, is a matter of convenience and is not a requirement of this specification (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] Binding to Application-Specific Protocols).

7.1.4 HTTP Media-Type

Conforming implementations of this binding:

MUST be capable of sending and receiving messages serialized using media type "application/soap+xml" whose proper use and parameters are described in A. The application/soap+xml Media Type.
MAY send requests and responses using other media types providing that such media types provide for at least the transfer of SOAP XML Infoset.
MAY, when sending requests, provide an HTTP Accept header field. This header field:
- SHOULD indicate an ability to accept at minimum "application/soap+xml".
- MAY additionally indicate willingness to accept other media types that satisfy 2 above.

7.2 Binding Name

This binding is identified by the URI (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] SOAP Protocol Binding Framework):

"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/"

7.3 Supported Message Exchange Patterns

An implementation of the SOAP HTTP Binding MUST support the following message exchange patterns (MEPs):

"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/" (see 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern)
"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/" (see 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern)

7.4 Supported Features

An implementation of the SOAP HTTP Binding MUST support the following additional features:

"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/" (see 6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature)
"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/action/" (see 6.5 SOAP Action Feature)

The possible values of http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method property are restricted in this HTTP binding according to the MEP in use (as present in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName ):

Table 15: Possible values of the Web-Method Method property
`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName`	`http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method`
"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/"	"POST"
"http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/"	"GET"

Note:

~~other~~Other SOAP Version 1.2 bindings to HTTP may permit other combinations of http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/ExchangePatternName and http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method .

7.5 MEP Operation

For binding instances conforming to this specification:

A SOAP node instantiated at an HTTP client may assume the role ~~(i.e.~~(i.e., the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Rolehttp://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role ) of "RequestingSOAPNode".
A SOAP node instantiated at an HTTP server may assume the role ~~(i.e.~~(i.e., the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Rolehttp://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role ) of "RespondingSOAPNode".

The remainder of this section describes the MEP state machine and its relation to the HTTP protocol. In the state tables below, the states are defined as values of the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State (see 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern and 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern), and are of type xs:anyURI . For brevity, relative URIs are used, the base URI being the value of http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role .

The message exchange pattern in use is indicated by the HTTP method used in the request. HTTP GET corresponds to the SOAP-Response MEP, HTTP POST corresponds to the SOAP Request-Response MEP.

7.5.1 Behavior of Requesting SOAP Node

The overall flow of the behavior of a requesting SOAP node follows a state machine description consistent with either 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern or 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern (differences are indicated as necessary.) This binding supports streaming and, as a result, requesting SOAP nodes MUST avoid deadlock by accepting and if necessary processing SOAP response information while the SOAP request is being transmitted (see 6.2.3 State Machine Description). The following subsections describe each state in detail.

7.5.1.1 Init

In the "Init" state, a HTTP request is formulated according to Table 16 and transmission of the request is initiated.

Table 16: HTTP Request Fields
Field	Value
HTTP Method	According to the `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method` property. POST and GET are the only values supported by this binding.
Request URI	The value of the URI carried in the `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination` property of the message exchange context.
Content-Type header field	The media type of the request entity ~~body~~ ~~(if~~ ~~present)~~body, if present; otherwise, omitted (see 7.1 Introduction for a description of permissible media types). If the SOAP envelope infoset in the `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage` property is null, then the `Content-Type` header field MAY be omitted.
action parameter	According to the value of the `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/action/Action` property.
Accept header field (optional)	List of media types that are acceptable in response to the request message.
Additional header fields	Generated in accordance with the rules for the ~~binding~~ ~~specific~~binding-specific expression of any optional features in use for this message exchange. For example, a Content-Encoding header field (see HTTP [RFC 2616], section 14.11) may be used to express an optional compression feature.
HTTP entity body	SOAP message serialized according to the rules for carrying SOAP messages in the media type given by the Content-Type header field. Rules for carrying SOAP messages in media type "application/soap+xml" are given in A. The application/soap+xml Media Type. If the SOAP envelope infoset in the `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage` property is null, the entity body is omitted

7.5.1.2 Requesting

In the "Requesting" state, sending of the request continues while waiting for the start of the response message. Table 17 details the transitions that take place when a requesting SOAP node receives an HTTP status line and response header fields. For some status codes there is a choice of possible next state. In cases where "Fail" is one of the choices, the transition is dependent on whether a SOAP message is present in the HTTP response. If a SOAP message is present, the next state is "Sending+Receiving" or "Receiving", otherwise the next state is "Fail". The choice between "Sending+Receiving" and "Receiving" depends of the MEP in use: "Sending+Receiving" is the next state for Request-Response while "Receiving" is the next state for SOAP-Response.

Table 17: HTTP status code dependent transitions
Status Code	Reason phrase	Significance/Action	NextState
2xx	Successful
200	OK	The response message follows in the HTTP response entity body. Start making an abstraction of the response message available in `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/InboundMessage` .	"Sending+Receiving" or "Receiving"
~~3xx~~ ~~Redirection~~202	OK	The request has been accepted, but either (a) no response envelope is provided or (b) an envelope representing information related to the request is provided -- such envelopes SHOULD be processed using the SOAP Processing model (see SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1], section SOAP Processing Model).	"Receiving" (which will immediately transition to "Success")
301, 302, 307	Redirect	The requested resource has ~~moved~~ ~~and~~moved. In the case of unsafe HTTP method, like POST or PUT, explicit confirmation is required before proceeding as follow. In the case of a safe method, like GET, or if the redirection has been approved, the HTTP request SHOULD be retried using the URI carried in the associated Location header field as the new value for the `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination` property.	"Init" ~~4xx~~ ~~Client~~ ~~Error~~ ~~400~~ ~~Bad~~ ~~Request~~ ~~Indicates~~or "Fail"
303	See Other	The requested resource has moved and the HTTP request SHOULD be retried using the URI carried in the associated Location header field as the new value for the `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination` property. The value of `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method` is changed to ""GET"", the value of `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage` is set to "null". [Note: Status code 303 MUST NOT be sent unless the request SOAP envelope has been processed according to the SOAP processing model and the SOAP response is to be made available by retrieval from the URI provided with the 303.]	"Init"
4xx	Client Error
400	Bad Request	Indicates a problem with the received HTTP request message.	"Sending+Receiving", "Receiving" or "Fail"
401	Unauthorized	Indicates that the HTTP request requires authorization. If ~~the~~ ~~simple~~ ~~authentication~~ ~~feature~~ is ~~unavailable~~ or ~~the~~ ~~operation~~ of ~~simple~~ ~~authentication~~ ~~ultimately~~ ~~fails,~~ ~~then~~ ~~the~~The message exchange is regarded as having completed unsuccessfully.	"Requesting" or "Fail"
405	Method not allowed	Indicates that the peer HTTP server does not support the requested HTTP method at the given request URI. The message exchange is regarded as having completed unsuccessfully.	"Fail"
415	Unsupported Media Type	Indicates that the peer HTTP server does not support the Content-type used to encode the request message. The message exchange is regarded as having completed unsuccessfully.	"Fail"
5xx	Server Error
500	Internal Server Error	Indicates a server problem or a problem with the received request	"Sending+Receiving", "Receiving" or "Fail"

Table 17 refers to some but not all of the existing HTTP/1.1 [RFC 2616] status codes. In addition to these status codes, HTTP provides an open-ended mechanism for supporting status codes defined by HTTP extensions (see RFC 2817 [RFC 2817] for a registration mechanism for new status codes). HTTP status codes are divided into status code classes as described in HTTP [RFC 2616], section 6.1.1. The SOAP HTTP binding follows the rules of any HTTP application which means that an implementation of the SOAP HTTP binding must understand the class of any status code, as indicated by the first digit, and treat any unrecognized response as being equivalent to the x00 status code of that class, with the exception that an unrecognized response must not be cached.

Note:

There may be elements in the HTTP infrastructure configured to modify HTTP response entity bodies for 4xx and 5xx status code responses. For example, some HTTP origin servers have such a feature as a configuration option. This behavior may interfere with the use of 4xx and 5xx status code responses carrying SOAP fault messages in HTTP and it is recommended that such behavior isbe disabled for resources accepting SOAP/HTTP requests. If the rewriting behavior cannot be disabled, SOAP/HTTP cannot be used in such configurations.

7.5.1.3 Sending+Receiving

In the "Sending+Receiving" state (6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern only), the transmission of the request message and receiving of the response message is completed. ~~The~~Only in the case that a status code 200 is received, the response message is assumed to contain a SOAP envelope serialized according to the rules for carrying SOAP messages in the media type given in the Content-Type header field.

The response MAY be of content type other than "application/soap+xml". Such usage is considered non-normative, and accordingly is not modeled in the state machine. Interpretation of such responses is at the discretion of the receiver. Similarly, receipt of any response entity-body with a status code of 202 is not normative. If such an unexpected response is of type "application/soap+xml", then SOAP processing of that response is beyond the scope of the specification for this binding.

7.5.1.4 Receiving

In the "Receiving" state (6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern only), receiving of the response message is completed. ~~The~~Only in the case of status code 200, the response message is assumed to contain a SOAP envelope serialized according to the rules for carrying SOAP messages in the media type given in the Content-Type header field.

The response MAY be of content type other than "application/soap+xml". Such a result is particularly likely when a SOAP request sent with a http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method of "GET" is directed (intentionally or otherwise) to a non-SOAP HTTP server. Such usage is considered non-normative, and accordingly is not modeled in the state machine. Interpretation of such responses is at the discretion of the receiver. Similarly, receipt of any response entity-body with a status code of 202 is not normative. If such an unexpected response is of type "application/soap+xml", then SOAP processing of that response is beyond the scope of the specification for this binding.

7.5.1.5 Success and Fail

"Success" and "Fail" are the terminal states of the Request-Response and SOAP-Response MEPs. Control over the message exchange context returns to the local SOAP node.

If the "success" state has been reached and if a SOAP envelope has been received, then the local node is a SOAP Receiver as defined in SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] section Message Sender and Receiver Concepts, and in particular MUST obey the requirement of section SOAP Nodes to process the message according to the SOAP Processing Model (see SOAP Processing Model).

7.5.2 Behavior of Responding SOAP Node

The overall flow of the behavior of a responding SOAP node follows a state machine description consistent with either 6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern or 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern (differences are indicated as necessary). The following subsections describe each state in detail.

7.5.2.1 Init

In the "Init" state, the binding waits for the start of an inbound request message. Table 18 describes the errors that a responding SOAP node might generate while in the "Init" state. In this state no SOAP message has been received, therefore the SOAP node cannot generate a SOAP fault.

Table 18: Errors generated in the Init state
Problem with Message	HTTP Status Code	HTTP Reason Phrase (informative)
Malformed Request Message	400	Bad request
HTTP Method is neither POST nor GET	405	Method Not Allowed
Unsupported message encapsulation method	415	Unsupported Media

7.5.2.2 Receiving

In the "Receiving" state, the binding receives the request and any associated message and waits for the start of a response message to be available. Table 19 describes the HTTP response header fields generated by the responding SOAP node. Table 20 describes the HTTP status codes associated with SOAP faults that can be generated by the responding SOAP node.

Table 19: HTTP Response Headers Fields
Field	Value
Status line	~~200,~~If a SOAP Envelope response is available in `http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/OutboundMessage` then 200, or set according to Table 20 if a SOAP fault was generated. Otherwise, if no such SOAP envelope is provided, then 202.
Content-Type header field	~~The~~If Status line is 200, then the media type of the response body, see 7.1 Introduction for a description of permissible media types. If status line is other than 200, then the Content-Type header is not sent.
Additional header fields	Generated in accordance with the rules for the ~~binding~~ ~~specific~~binding-specific expression of any optional features in use for this message exchange. For example, a Content-Encoding header field (see HTTP [RFC 2616], section 14.11) may be used to express an optional compression feature.
HTTP Entity Body	Only if status line is 200, the SOAP message serialized according to the rules for carrying SOAP messages in the media type given by the Content-Type header field. Rules for carrying SOAP messages in "application/soap+xml" are given in A. The application/soap+xml Media Type.

Table 20: SOAP Fault to HTTP Status Mapping
SOAP Fault	HTTP Status Code	HTTP Reason Phrase (informative)
env:VersionMismatch	500	Internal server error
env:MustUnderstand	500	Internal server error
env:Sender	400	Bad request
env:Receiver	500	Internal server error
env:DataEncodingUnknown	500	Internal server error

7.5.2.3 Receiving+Sending

In the "Receiving+Sending" state (6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern only) the binding completes receiving of the request message and transmission of the response message.

7.5.2.4 Sending

In the "Sending" state (6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern only) the binding completes transmission of the response message.

7.5.2.5 Success and Fail

"Success" and "Fail" are the terminal states for the Request-Response and SOAP-Response MEPs. From the point-of-view of the local node this message exchange has completed.

7.6 Security Considerations

The SOAP HTTP Binding (see 7. SOAP HTTP Binding) can be considered as an extension of the HTTP application protocol. As such, all of the security considerations identified and described in section 15 of the HTTP specification [RFC 2616] apply to the SOAP HTTP Binding in addition to those described in SOAP 1.2 Part 1 [SOAP Part 1] Security Considerations. Implementors of the SOAP HTTP Binding should carefully review this material.

8. References

8.1 Normative References

[SOAP Part 1]: ~~W3C~~ ~~Proposed~~ ~~Recommendation~~ ~~"SOAP~~SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging ~~Framework",~~Framework (Second Edition), Martin Gudgin, Marc Hadley, Noah Mendelsohn, Jean-Jacques Moreau, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, 24 ~~June~~ ~~2003~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624~~ .)Anish Karmarkar, Yves Lafon, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 27 April 2007. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part1-20070427. The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/.
[RFC 2616]: ~~IETF~~ ~~"RFC~~ ~~2616:~~Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- ~~HTTP/1.1",~~HTTP/1.1, R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. C. Mogul, H. ~~Frystyk,~~Frystyk Nielsen, P. Leach, L. Masinter and T. Berners-Lee, ~~January~~ ~~1997.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt~~ .)Editors. IETF, June 1999. This RFC is available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt.
[RFC 2119]: ~~IETF~~ ~~"RFC~~ ~~2119:~~Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement ~~Levels",~~Levels, S. Bradner, Editor. IETF, March 1997. ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt~~ .)This RFC is available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt.
[XML Schema Part 1]: ~~W3C~~ ~~Recommendation~~ ~~"XML~~XML Schema Part 1: ~~Structures",~~ ~~Henry~~ S. ~~Thompson,~~Structures Second Edition, David Beech, Murray Maloney, Henry S. Thompson, and Noah Mendelsohn, 2 ~~May~~ ~~2001.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/~~ .)Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 28 October 2004. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/ The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/.
[XML Schema Part 2]: ~~W3C~~ ~~Recommendation~~ ~~"XML~~XML Schema Part 2: ~~Datatypes",~~Datatypes Second Edition, Ashok Malhotra and Paul V. Biron, ~~Ashok~~ ~~Malhotra,~~ 2 ~~May~~ ~~2001.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/~~ .)Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 28 October 2004. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/. The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/.
[RFC ~~2396]~~ ~~IETF~~ ~~"RFC~~ ~~2396:~~3986]: Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic ~~Syntax",~~Syntax, T. Berners-Lee, R. ~~Fielding,~~Fielding and L. Masinter, ~~August~~ ~~1998.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt~~ .)Editors. IETF, January 2005. Obsoletes: RFC 2396, RFC 2732. This RFC is available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt.
[Namespaces in XML]: ~~W3C~~ ~~Recommendation~~ ~~"Namespaces~~Namespaces in ~~XML",~~XML (Second Edition), Tim Bray, Dave Hollander, Andrew Layman, 14 ~~January~~ ~~1999.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/~~ .)and Richard Tobin, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 16 August 2006. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816. The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names.
[XML 1.0]: ~~W3C~~ ~~Recommendation~~ ~~"Extensible~~Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 ~~(Second~~ ~~Edition)",~~ ~~Tim~~ ~~Bray,~~(Fourth Edition), Jean Paoli, C. M. ~~Sperberg-McQueen,~~Eve Maler, 6 ~~October~~ ~~2000.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006~~ .)Tim Bray, et. al., Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 16 August 2006. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816. The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.
[XML InfoSet]: ~~W3C~~ ~~Recommendation~~ ~~"XML~~XML Information ~~Set",~~Set (Second Edition), Richard Tobin and John Cowan, ~~Richard~~ ~~Tobin,~~ 24 ~~October~~ ~~2001.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-infoset-20011024/~~ .) ~~[RFC~~ ~~3023]~~ ~~IETF~~ ~~"RFC~~ ~~3023:~~ ~~XML~~ ~~Media~~ ~~Types",~~ M. ~~Murata,~~ S. ~~St.~~ ~~Laurent,~~ D. ~~Kohn,~~ ~~July~~ ~~1998.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt~~ .)Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 04 February 2004. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204. The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset.
[RFC 3023]: XML Media Types M. Murata, S. St.Laurent, D. Kohn, Editors. IETF, January 2001. This RFC is available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt.
[RFC 3902]: The "application/soap+xml" media type, M. Baker, M. Nottingham, Editors. IETF, September 2004. This RFC is available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3902.txt.

8.2 Informative References

[SOAP 1.1]: Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1, Don Box, David Ehnebuske, Gopal Kakivaya, Andrew Layman, Noah Mendelsohn, Henrik Nielsen, Satish Thatte, Dave Winer, Editors. DevelopMentor, IBM, Microsoft, Lotus Development Corp., UserLand Software, Inc., 30 July 2003. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/.
[SOAP Part 0]: ~~W3C~~ ~~Proposed~~ ~~Recommendation~~ ~~"SOAP~~SOAP Version 1.2 Part 0: ~~Primer",~~Primer (Second Edition), Nilo Mitra, 24 ~~June~~ ~~2003~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part0-20030624~~ .) ~~[SOAP~~ ~~MediaType]~~ ~~IETF~~ ~~Internet~~ ~~Draft~~ ~~"The~~ ~~'application/soap+xml'~~ ~~media~~ ~~type",~~ M. ~~Baker,~~ M. ~~Nottingham,~~ ~~"draft-baker-soap-media-reg-03.txt"~~ ~~May~~ ~~29,~~ ~~2003.~~ ~~Note~~ ~~that~~ ~~this~~ ~~Internet~~ ~~Draft~~ ~~expires~~ in ~~November~~ ~~2003.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-soap-media-reg-03.txt~~ .)Yves Lafon, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 27 April 2007. This version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part0-20070427. The latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/.
[XMLP Comments]: XML Protocol Comments Archive (See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/.)
[XMLP Dist-App]: XML Protocol Discussion Archive (See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/.)
[XMLP Charter]: XML Protocol Charter (See ~~http://www.w3.org/2000/09/XML-Protocol-Charter~~http://www.w3.org/2005/07/XML-Protocol-Charter.)
[RFC 2045]: ~~IETF~~ ~~"RFC2045:~~Multipurpose Internet Mail ~~Extensions~~ ~~(MIME)~~ ~~Part~~ ~~One:~~ ~~Format~~ of ~~Internet~~ ~~Message~~ ~~Bodies",~~ N. ~~Freed,~~ N. ~~Borenstein,~~ ~~November~~ ~~1996.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt~~ .) ~~[RFC~~ ~~2026]~~ ~~IETF~~ ~~"RFC~~ ~~2026:~~ ~~The~~ ~~Internet~~ ~~Standards~~ ~~Process~~ -- ~~Revision~~ ~~3",~~ ~~section~~ ~~4.2.3,~~ S. ~~Bradner,~~ ~~October~~ ~~1996.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt~~ .) ~~[RFC~~ ~~2817]~~ ~~IETF~~ ~~"RFC~~ ~~2817:~~ ~~Upgrading~~ to ~~TLS~~ ~~Within~~ ~~HTTP/1.1",~~ R. ~~Khare,~~ S. ~~Lawrence,~~ ~~May~~ ~~2000.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2817.txt~~ .) ~~[CharMod]~~ ~~W3C~~ ~~Working~~ ~~Draft~~ ~~"Character~~ ~~Model~~ ~~for~~ ~~the~~ ~~World~~ ~~Wide~~ ~~Web~~ ~~1.0",~~ ~~Martin~~ J. ~~Durst,~~ ~~Francois~~ ~~Yergeau,~~ ~~Richard~~ ~~Ishida,~~ ~~Misha~~ ~~Wolf,~~ ~~Asmus~~ ~~Freytag,~~ ~~Tex~~ ~~Texin,~~ 30 ~~April~~ ~~2002.~~ ~~(See~~ ~~http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/~~ .) A. ~~The~~ ~~"application/soap+xml"~~ ~~Media~~ ~~Type~~ ~~This~~ ~~appendix~~ ~~defines~~ ~~the~~ ~~"application/soap+xml"~~ ~~media~~ ~~type~~ ~~which~~ ~~can~~ be ~~used~~ to ~~describe~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.2~~ ~~messages~~ ~~serialized~~ as ~~XML.~~ ~~Note:~~ At ~~the~~ ~~time~~ of ~~this~~ ~~document's~~ ~~publication,~~ ~~the~~ ~~process~~ ~~for~~ ~~registering~~ ~~this~~ ~~media~~ ~~type~~ ~~with~~ ~~IANA~~ ~~was~~ ~~underway~~ ~~using~~ ~~the~~ ~~[SOAP~~ ~~MediaType]~~ ~~Internet~~ ~~Draft.~~ A ~~future~~ ~~version~~ of ~~the~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~specification~~ ~~may~~ ~~reference~~ ~~the~~ ~~media~~ ~~type~~ in ~~the~~ ~~IANA~~ ~~registry.~~ ~~A.1~~ ~~Registration~~ ~~MIME~~ ~~media~~ ~~type~~ ~~name:~~ ~~application~~ ~~MIME~~ ~~subtype~~ ~~name:~~ ~~soap+xml~~ ~~Required~~ ~~parameters:~~ ~~none~~ ~~Optional~~ ~~parameters:~~ ~~charset~~ ~~This~~ ~~parameter~~ ~~has~~ ~~identical~~ ~~semantics~~ to ~~the~~ ~~charset~~ ~~parameter~~ of ~~the~~ ~~"application/xml"~~ ~~media~~ ~~type~~ as ~~specified~~ in ~~RFC~~ ~~3023~~ ~~[RFC~~ ~~3023]~~ . ~~action~~ ~~See~~ ~~section~~ ~~A.3~~ ~~The~~ ~~action~~ ~~Parameter~~ . ~~Encoding~~ ~~considerations:~~ ~~Identical~~ to ~~those~~ of ~~"application/xml"~~ as ~~described~~ in ~~RFC~~ ~~3023~~ ~~[RFC~~ ~~3023]~~ , ~~section~~ ~~3.2,~~ as ~~applied~~ to ~~the~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~envelope~~ ~~infoset.~~ ~~Security~~ ~~considerations:~~ ~~See~~ ~~section~~ ~~A.2~~ ~~Security~~ ~~Considerations~~ . ~~Interoperability~~ ~~considerations:~~ ~~There~~ ~~are~~ no ~~known~~ ~~interoperability~~ ~~issues.~~ ~~Published~~ ~~specification:~~ ~~This~~ ~~document~~ ~~(SOAP~~ ~~1.2~~ ~~Part~~ 2) ~~and~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.2~~ ~~Part~~ 1 ~~[SOAP~~ ~~Part~~ 1] . ~~Applications~~ ~~which~~ ~~use~~ ~~this~~ ~~media~~ ~~type:~~ No ~~known~~ ~~applications~~ ~~currently~~ ~~use~~ ~~this~~ ~~media~~ ~~type.~~ ~~Additional~~ ~~information:~~ ~~File~~ ~~extension:~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~messages~~ ~~are~~ ~~not~~ ~~required~~ or ~~expected~~ to be ~~stored~~ as ~~files.~~ ~~Fragment~~ ~~identifiers:~~ ~~Identical~~ to ~~that~~ of ~~"application/xml"~~ as ~~described~~ in ~~RFC~~ ~~3023~~ ~~[RFC~~ ~~3023]~~ , ~~section~~ 5. ~~Base~~ ~~URI:~~ As ~~specified~~ in ~~RFC~~ ~~3023~~ ~~[RFC~~ ~~3023]~~ , ~~section~~ 6. ~~Also~~ ~~see~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.2~~ ~~Part~~ 1 ~~[SOAP~~ ~~Part~~ 1] , ~~section~~ ~~Use~~ of ~~URIs~~ in ~~SOAP~~ . ~~Macintosh~~ ~~File~~ ~~Type~~ ~~code:~~ ~~TEXT~~ ~~Person~~ ~~and~~ ~~email~~ ~~address~~ to ~~contact~~ ~~for~~ ~~further~~ ~~information:~~ ~~Mark~~ ~~Baker~~ ~~<mbaker@idokorro.com>~~ ~~Intended~~ ~~usage:~~ ~~COMMON~~ ~~Author/Change~~ ~~controller:~~ ~~The~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.2~~ ~~specification~~ ~~set~~ is a ~~work~~ ~~product~~ of ~~the~~ ~~World~~ ~~Wide~~ ~~Web~~ ~~Consortium's~~ ~~XML~~ ~~Protocol~~ ~~Working~~ ~~Group~~ . ~~The~~ ~~W3C~~ ~~has~~ ~~change~~ ~~control~~ ~~over~~ ~~these~~ ~~specifications.~~ ~~A.2~~ ~~Security~~ ~~Considerations~~ ~~Because~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~can~~ ~~carry~~ ~~application~~ ~~defined~~ ~~data~~ ~~whose~~ ~~semantics~~ is ~~independent~~ ~~from~~ ~~that~~ of ~~any~~ ~~MIME~~ ~~wrapper~~ ~~(or~~ ~~context~~ ~~within~~ ~~which~~ ~~the~~ ~~MIME~~ ~~wrapper~~ is ~~used),~~ ~~one~~ ~~should~~ ~~not~~ ~~expect~~ to be ~~able~~ to ~~understand~~ ~~the~~ ~~semantics~~ of ~~the~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~message~~ ~~based~~ on ~~the~~ ~~semantics~~ of ~~the~~ ~~MIME~~ ~~wrapper~~ ~~alone.~~ ~~Therefore,~~ ~~whenever~~ ~~using~~ ~~the~~ ~~"application/soap+xml"~~ ~~media~~ ~~type,~~ it is ~~strongly~~ ~~RECOMMENDED~~ ~~that~~ ~~the~~ ~~security~~ ~~implications~~ of ~~the~~ ~~context~~ ~~within~~ ~~which~~ ~~the~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~message~~ is ~~used~~ is ~~fully~~ ~~understood.~~ ~~The~~ ~~security~~ ~~implications~~ ~~are~~ ~~likely~~ to ~~involve~~ ~~both~~ ~~the~~ ~~specific~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~binding~~ to an ~~underlying~~ ~~protocol~~ as ~~well~~ as ~~the~~ ~~application-defined~~ ~~semantics~~ of ~~the~~ ~~data~~ ~~carried~~ in ~~the~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~message~~ ~~(though~~ ~~one~~ ~~must~~ be ~~careful~~ ~~when~~ ~~doing~~ ~~this,~~ as ~~discussed~~ in ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.2~~ ~~Part~~ 1 ~~[SOAP~~ ~~Part~~ 1] , ~~section~~ ~~Binding~~ to ~~Application-Specific~~ ~~Protocols~~ . ~~Also,~~ ~~see~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.2~~ ~~Part~~ 1 ~~[SOAP~~ ~~Part~~ 1] , ~~the~~ ~~entire~~ ~~section~~ ~~Security~~ ~~Considerations~~ . In ~~addition,~~ as ~~this~~ ~~media~~ ~~type~~ ~~uses~~ ~~the~~ ~~"+xml"~~ ~~convention,~~ it ~~shares~~ ~~the~~ ~~same~~ ~~security~~ ~~considerations~~ as ~~described~~ in ~~RFC~~ ~~3023~~ ~~[RFC~~ ~~3023]~~ , ~~section~~ ~~10.~~ ~~A.3~~ ~~The~~ ~~action~~ ~~Parameter~~ ~~This~~ ~~optional~~ ~~parameter~~ ~~can~~ be ~~used~~ to ~~specify~~ ~~the~~ ~~URI~~ ~~that~~ ~~identifies~~ ~~the~~ ~~intent~~ of ~~the~~ ~~message.~~ In ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.2,~~ it ~~serves~~ a ~~similar~~ ~~purpose~~ as ~~the~~ ~~SOAPAction~~ ~~HTTP~~ ~~header~~ ~~field~~ ~~did~~ in ~~SOAP~~ ~~1.1.~~ ~~Namely,~~ ~~its~~ ~~value~~ ~~identifies~~ ~~the~~ ~~intent~~ of ~~the~~ ~~message.~~ ~~The~~ ~~value~~ of ~~the~~ ~~action~~ ~~parameter~~ is an ~~absolute~~ ~~URI-reference~~ as ~~defined~~ by ~~RFC~~ ~~2396~~ ~~[RFC~~ ~~2396]~~ . ~~SOAP~~ ~~places~~ no ~~restrictions~~ on ~~the~~ ~~specificity~~Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of ~~the~~ ~~URI~~ or ~~that~~ itInternet Message Bodies , N. Freed, N. Borenstein, Editors. IETF, November 1996. This RFC is ~~resolvable.~~ ~~Although~~ ~~the~~ ~~purpose~~ of ~~the~~ ~~action~~ ~~parameter~~available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt.
[RFC 2026]: The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3, S. Bradner, Editor. IETF, October 1996. This RFC is available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt.
[RFC 2817]: Upgrading to ~~indicate~~ ~~the~~ ~~intent~~ of ~~the~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~message~~ ~~there~~TLS Within HTTP/1.1, R. Khare, S. Lawrence, Editors. IETF, May 2000. This RFC is no ~~mechanism~~ ~~for~~ ~~automatically~~ ~~computing~~ ~~the~~ ~~value~~ ~~based~~ on ~~the~~ ~~SOAP~~ ~~envelope.~~ In ~~other~~ ~~words,~~ ~~the~~ ~~value~~ ~~has~~ to be ~~determined~~ ~~out~~ of ~~band.~~ Itavailable at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2817.txt.
[RFC 3987]: Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) , M. Duerst, Editors. IETF, January 2005. This RFC is ~~recommended~~ ~~that~~ ~~the~~ ~~same~~ ~~value~~ be ~~used~~ to ~~identify~~ ~~sets~~ of ~~message~~ ~~types~~ ~~that~~ ~~are~~ ~~logically~~ ~~connected~~ in ~~some~~ ~~manner,~~available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt.
[CharMod]: Character Model for ~~example~~ ~~part~~ ofthe ~~same~~ ~~"service".~~ ItWorld Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals, Martin J. Dürst, François Yergeau, Richard Ishida, Misha Wolf, Tex Texin, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 15 February 2005. This version is ~~strongly~~ ~~RECOMMENDED~~ ~~that~~ ~~the~~ ~~URI~~ be ~~globally~~ ~~unique~~ ~~and~~ ~~stable~~ ~~over~~ ~~time.~~http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/. The ~~presence~~ ~~and~~ ~~content~~latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/.

SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts (Second Edition)

W3C Recommendation 24 June 200327 April 2007

Abstract

Status of this Document

Short Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Appendices

1. Introduction

1.1 Notational Conventions

2. SOAP Data Model

2.1 Graph Edges

2.1.1 Edge labels

2.2 Graph Nodes

2.2.1 Single and Multi Reference Nodes

2.3 Values

3. SOAP Encoding

3.1 Mapping between XML and the SOAP Data Model

3.1.1 Encoding Graph Edges and Nodes

3.1.2 Encoding Simple Values

3.1.3 Encoding Compound Values

3.1.4 Computing the Type Name Property

3.1.4.1 itemType Attribute Information Item

3.1.5 Unique identifiers

3.1.5.1 id Attribute Information Item

3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item

3.1.5.3 Constraints on id and ref Attribute Information Items

3.1.6 arraySize Attribute Information Item

3.1.7 nodeType Attribute Information Item

3.2 Decoding Faults

4. SOAP RPC Representation

4.1 Use of RPC on the World Wide Web

4.1.1 Identification of RPC Resources

4.1.2 Distinguishing Resource Retrievals from other RPCs

4.2 RPC and SOAP Body

4.2.1 RPC Invocation

4.2.2 RPC Response

4.2.3 SOAP Encoding Restriction

4.3 RPC and SOAP Header

4.4 RPC Faults

5. A Convention for Describing Features and Bindings

5.1 Model and Properties

5.1.1 Properties

5.1.2 Property Scope

5.1.2.1 Message Exchange Context

5.1.2.2 Environment Context

5.1.3 Properties and Features

6. SOAP-Supplied Message Exchange Patterns and Features

6.1 Property Conventions for SOAP Message Exchange Patterns

6.2 SOAP Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern

6.2.1 SOAP Feature Name

6.2.2 Description

6.2.3 State Machine Description

6.2.4 Fault Handling

6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern

6.3.1 SOAP Feature Name

6.3.2 Description

6.3.3 State Machine Description

6.3.4 Fault Handling

6.4 SOAP Web Method Feature

6.4.1 SOAP Feature Name

6.4.2 Description

6.4.3 SOAP Web Method Feature State Machine

6.5 SOAP Action Feature

6.5.1 SOAP Feature Name

6.5.2 Description

6.5.3 SOAP Action Feature State Machine

7. SOAP HTTP Binding

7.1 Introduction

7.1.1 Optionality

For example, another binding might provide for a 202 or 204 HTTP response status to be returned in response to an HTTP POST or PUT (e.g. a one-way "push" MEP with confirmation).7.1.2 Use of HTTP

7.1.3 Interoperability with non-SOAP HTTP Implementations

7.1.4 HTTP Media-Type

7.2 Binding Name

7.3 Supported Message Exchange Patterns

7.4 Supported Features

7.5 MEP Operation

7.5.1 Behavior of Requesting SOAP Node

7.5.1.1 Init

7.5.1.2 Requesting

7.5.1.3 Sending+Receiving