Next: Root Finding References and Further Reading, Previous: Root Finding Algorithms using Derivatives, Up: One dimensional Root-Finding [Index]
For any root finding algorithm we need to prepare the function to be solved. For this example we will use the general quadratic equation described earlier. We first need a header file (demo_fn.h) to define the function parameters,
struct quadratic_params { double a, b, c; }; double quadratic (double x, void *params); double quadratic_deriv (double x, void *params); void quadratic_fdf (double x, void *params, double *y, double *dy);
We place the function definitions in a separate file (demo_fn.c),
double quadratic (double x, void *params) { struct quadratic_params *p = (struct quadratic_params *) params; double a = p->a; double b = p->b; double c = p->c; return (a * x + b) * x + c; } double quadratic_deriv (double x, void *params) { struct quadratic_params *p = (struct quadratic_params *) params; double a = p->a; double b = p->b; return 2.0 * a * x + b; } void quadratic_fdf (double x, void *params, double *y, double *dy) { struct quadratic_params *p = (struct quadratic_params *) params; double a = p->a; double b = p->b; double c = p->c; *y = (a * x + b) * x + c; *dy = 2.0 * a * x + b; }
The first program uses the function solver gsl_root_fsolver_brent
for Brent’s method and the general quadratic defined above to solve the
following equation,
x^2 - 5 = 0
with solution x = \sqrt 5 = 2.236068...
#include <stdio.h> #include <gsl/gsl_errno.h> #include <gsl/gsl_math.h> #include <gsl/gsl_roots.h> #include "demo_fn.h" #include "demo_fn.c" int main (void) { int status; int iter = 0, max_iter = 100; const gsl_root_fsolver_type *T; gsl_root_fsolver *s; double r = 0, r_expected = sqrt (5.0); double x_lo = 0.0, x_hi = 5.0; gsl_function F; struct quadratic_params params = {1.0, 0.0, -5.0}; F.function = &quadratic; F.params = ¶ms; T = gsl_root_fsolver_brent; s = gsl_root_fsolver_alloc (T); gsl_root_fsolver_set (s, &F, x_lo, x_hi); printf ("using %s method\n", gsl_root_fsolver_name (s)); printf ("%5s [%9s, %9s] %9s %10s %9s\n", "iter", "lower", "upper", "root", "err", "err(est)"); do { iter++; status = gsl_root_fsolver_iterate (s); r = gsl_root_fsolver_root (s); x_lo = gsl_root_fsolver_x_lower (s); x_hi = gsl_root_fsolver_x_upper (s); status = gsl_root_test_interval (x_lo, x_hi, 0, 0.001); if (status == GSL_SUCCESS) printf ("Converged:\n"); printf ("%5d [%.7f, %.7f] %.7f %+.7f %.7f\n", iter, x_lo, x_hi, r, r - r_expected, x_hi - x_lo); } while (status == GSL_CONTINUE && iter < max_iter); gsl_root_fsolver_free (s); return status; }
Here are the results of the iterations,
$ ./a.out using brent method iter [ lower, upper] root err err(est) 1 [1.0000000, 5.0000000] 1.0000000 -1.2360680 4.0000000 2 [1.0000000, 3.0000000] 3.0000000 +0.7639320 2.0000000 3 [2.0000000, 3.0000000] 2.0000000 -0.2360680 1.0000000 4 [2.2000000, 3.0000000] 2.2000000 -0.0360680 0.8000000 5 [2.2000000, 2.2366300] 2.2366300 +0.0005621 0.0366300 Converged: 6 [2.2360634, 2.2366300] 2.2360634 -0.0000046 0.0005666
If the program is modified to use the bisection solver instead of
Brent’s method, by changing gsl_root_fsolver_brent
to
gsl_root_fsolver_bisection
the slower convergence of the
Bisection method can be observed,
$ ./a.out using bisection method iter [ lower, upper] root err err(est) 1 [0.0000000, 2.5000000] 1.2500000 -0.9860680 2.5000000 2 [1.2500000, 2.5000000] 1.8750000 -0.3610680 1.2500000 3 [1.8750000, 2.5000000] 2.1875000 -0.0485680 0.6250000 4 [2.1875000, 2.5000000] 2.3437500 +0.1076820 0.3125000 5 [2.1875000, 2.3437500] 2.2656250 +0.0295570 0.1562500 6 [2.1875000, 2.2656250] 2.2265625 -0.0095055 0.0781250 7 [2.2265625, 2.2656250] 2.2460938 +0.0100258 0.0390625 8 [2.2265625, 2.2460938] 2.2363281 +0.0002601 0.0195312 9 [2.2265625, 2.2363281] 2.2314453 -0.0046227 0.0097656 10 [2.2314453, 2.2363281] 2.2338867 -0.0021813 0.0048828 11 [2.2338867, 2.2363281] 2.2351074 -0.0009606 0.0024414 Converged: 12 [2.2351074, 2.2363281] 2.2357178 -0.0003502 0.0012207
The next program solves the same function using a derivative solver instead.
#include <stdio.h> #include <gsl/gsl_errno.h> #include <gsl/gsl_math.h> #include <gsl/gsl_roots.h> #include "demo_fn.h" #include "demo_fn.c" int main (void) { int status; int iter = 0, max_iter = 100; const gsl_root_fdfsolver_type *T; gsl_root_fdfsolver *s; double x0, x = 5.0, r_expected = sqrt (5.0); gsl_function_fdf FDF; struct quadratic_params params = {1.0, 0.0, -5.0}; FDF.f = &quadratic; FDF.df = &quadratic_deriv; FDF.fdf = &quadratic_fdf; FDF.params = ¶ms; T = gsl_root_fdfsolver_newton; s = gsl_root_fdfsolver_alloc (T); gsl_root_fdfsolver_set (s, &FDF, x); printf ("using %s method\n", gsl_root_fdfsolver_name (s)); printf ("%-5s %10s %10s %10s\n", "iter", "root", "err", "err(est)"); do { iter++; status = gsl_root_fdfsolver_iterate (s); x0 = x; x = gsl_root_fdfsolver_root (s); status = gsl_root_test_delta (x, x0, 0, 1e-3); if (status == GSL_SUCCESS) printf ("Converged:\n"); printf ("%5d %10.7f %+10.7f %10.7f\n", iter, x, x - r_expected, x - x0); } while (status == GSL_CONTINUE && iter < max_iter); gsl_root_fdfsolver_free (s); return status; }
Here are the results for Newton’s method,
$ ./a.out using newton method iter root err err(est) 1 3.0000000 +0.7639320 -2.0000000 2 2.3333333 +0.0972654 -0.6666667 3 2.2380952 +0.0020273 -0.0952381 Converged: 4 2.2360689 +0.0000009 -0.0020263
Note that the error can be estimated more accurately by taking the
difference between the current iterate and next iterate rather than the
previous iterate. The other derivative solvers can be investigated by
changing gsl_root_fdfsolver_newton
to
gsl_root_fdfsolver_secant
or
gsl_root_fdfsolver_steffenson
.