This document describes the relative ordering and rough timeline for all of the steps related to tasks that need to be completed during a release cycle for Cinder.
Collect topics and prepare notes for PTG discussions in an etherpad. The PTGbot will generate a list of etherpads at some point that will be named according to the convention:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/<release-name>-ptg-cinder
(You can use a different name, but following the convention makes it easy to locate the etherpad for any project for any release. Something we’ve done in the past is to do the planning on an etherpad named:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/<release-name>-ptg-cinder-planning
and then move the topics over to the “real” etherpad when the team has decided on what to include and the ordering. Do whatever works for you. Just make sure the team knows where the planning etherpad is and give everyone plenty of reminders to add topics.
Add any Cinder-specific schedule information to the release calendar as soon as it’s available. Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/754484
We used to wait to do this until after proposed deadlines were discussed at the PTG, but recently people have been getting antsy about what the deadlines are as soon as the stable branch for the previous release is cut (which is roughly a month before the PTG). So you may want to go ahead and post the patch early and announce the dates at a Cinder meeting so that people can point out conflicts. Or do it the old-fashioned way and work it out at the PTG. Either way, the point is to make sure you don’t forget to add Cinder-specific dates to the main release schedule.
Review the Cinder Groups in Gerrit and Launchpad.
Review output from the PTG and set Review-Priority on any high priority items identified from those discussions. Send out recap to the mailing list.
Review information about standing Cinder meetings posted at https://meetings.opendev.org/ in case any changes were discussed at the PTG. You make changes by proposing a patch to https://opendev.org/opendev/irc-meetings
Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/irc-meetings/+/695339
Supported Python versions
The supported Python runtimes for the cycle may have changed from the previous cycle. You can find them at https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/
Review the tox testenvs defined in tox.ini
and make sure there
are functional testenvs for each. You don’t have to worry about
unit tests–tox is smart enough to know what to do for those–but
if you specify tox -e functional-py312
tox will bomb unless
there’s a ‘functional-py312’ testenv defined.
The OpenStack required check and gate tests are defined in a template
in zuul.d/project-templates.yaml in the
openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs repo. The template is maintained by
the OpenStack QA team. It should have an easily recognizable name,
for example, openstack-python3-zed-jobs
.
Usually there will be autogenerated patches for each cinder project repo to change the template from the previous cycle’s to the current cycle’s, so watch for those. Or you can proactively make the changes yourself as soon as the template is available.
Example new template patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/831826
Focus on spec reviews to get them approved and updated early in the cycle to allow enough time for implementation.
Review new driver submissions and give early feedback so there isn’t a rush at the new driver deadline. Check for status of third party CI and any missing steps they need to know about.
Review community-wide goals and decide a plan or response to them.
Propose library releases for os-brick or python-cinderclient if there are merged commits ready to be released. Watch for any releases proposed by the release team.
Check progress on new drivers and specs and warn contributors if it looks like they are at risk for making it in this cycle.
cinderlib is a “trailing” deliverable type on a “cycle-with-intermediary” release model. That means that its release for the previous cycle hasn’t happened yet. The release must happen no later than 3 months after the main release, which will put it roughly one week before Milestone-2 (check the current release schedule for the exact deadline). Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/742503
Review stable backports and release status.
The Cinder Spec Freeze usually occurs sometime within this window. After all the approved specs have merged, propose a patch that adds a directory for the next release. (You may have to wait until the release name has been determined by the TC.) Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/778436
Watch for and respond to updates to new driver patches.
Propose library releases for os-brick or python-cinderclient if there are merged commits ready to be released. Watch for any releases proposed by the release team.
Review stable backports and release status.
Set Review-Priority for any os-brick changes that are needed for feature work to make sure they are ready by the library freeze prior to Milestone-3.
Make sure any new feature work that needs client changes are proposed and on track to land before the client library freeze at Milestone-3. Ensure microversion bumps are reflected in cinderclient/api_versions.py MAX_VERSION.
The week before Milestone-3, propose releases for unreleased changes in os-brick. (The release team may have already proposed an auto- generated patch 1-2 weeks earlier; make sure you -1 it if there are still changes that need to land in os-brick before release.) Include branch request for stable/$series creation. Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/804670
Propose releases for unreleased changes in python-cinderclient and python-brick-cinderclient-ext. These will be the official cycle releases for these deliverables. Watch for a release patch proposed by the release team; it may need to be updated to include all the appropriate changes. Include branch request for stable/$series creation. Example patches: | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/806583 | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807167
Set Review-Priority -1 for any feature work not complete in time for inclusion in this cycle. Remind contributors that FFE will need to be requested to still allow it in this cycle.
Complete the responses to community-wide goals if not already done.
Add cycle-highlights in the releases deliverable file. The deadline for this has been moved up (since wallaby) to the Friday of M-3 week. (There should be an entry on the cycle release schedule, and a reminder email with subject “[PTLs][release] xxx Cycle Highlights” to the ML.)
The Foundation people use the info to start preparing press releases for the cycle coordinated release, so it’s good to have key features mentioned. (If something has an FFE and you’re not sure if it will land, you can always update the cycle-highlights later and shoot an email to whoever sent out the reminder so they know to look for it.)
Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/807398
Make sure the maximum microversion is up-to-date in the version history
file cinder/api/openstack/rest_api_version_history.rst
Any patch that bumped the microversion should have already included an entry in this file; you need to add “(Maximum in <release-name>)” to the last (highest) entry.
This file is pulled into the api-ref by the documentation build process.
Prepare “prelude” release notes as summaries of the content of the release so that those are merged before their first release candidate.
Check the “Driver Removal History” section (bottom) of
doc/source/reference/support-matrix.rst
to make sure any drivers
removed during the cycle are mentioned there.
Check the upgrade check tool cmd/status.py
to make sure the
removed drivers list is up to date.
Propose RC1 release for cinder or watch for proposal from the release team.
Include stable/$series
branching request with the release.
Update any cycle-highlights for the release cycle if there was something you weren’t sure about at M-3.
Remind contributors that master
is now the next cycle but focus should
be on wrapping up the current cycle.
Watch for translation and new stable branch patches and merge them quickly.
The release team has started adding a ‘release-notes’ field to the deliverables’ yaml files. You can watch for the patch and vote on it if you see it. Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/810236
Related to the previous point: at this time in the cycle, the release notes for all the cinder cycle deliverables (cinder, os-brick, python-cinderclient, and python-brick-cinderclient-ext) should have been published automatically at https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/. Sometimes the promotion job fails, though, so it’s good to check that the release notes for the current cycle are actually there.
Propose additional RC releases as needed.
Note
Try to avoid creating more than 3 release candidates so we are not creating candidates that consumers are then trained to ignore. Each release candidate should be kept for at least 1 day, so if there is a proposal to create RCx but clearly a reason to create another one, delay RCX to include the additional patches.
Watch for translation patches and merge them quickly.
Make sure final RC request is done one week before the final release date.
Start planning for next release cycle.
Check for bugfixes that would be good to backport to older stable branches.
Propose any bugfix releases for things that did not make the freeze for final library or service releases.
Make sure at least three SQLAlchemy-Migrate migrations are reserved for potential backports. Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/649436
Unblock any new driver submission patches that missed the previous release cycle’s deadline.
Review approved cinder-specs that were merged to the previous cycle folder that did not get implemented. Revert or move those specs to the next cycles’s folder.
The oldest active stable branch (that is, the oldest one you can still release from) will go to Extended Maintenance mode shortly after the coordinated release. Watch for an email notification from the release team about the projected date, which you can also find in the “Next Phase” column for that release series on https://releases.openstack.org
Prioritize any open reviews that should get into the final stable release from this branch for all relevant cinder deliverables and motivate the cinder-stable-maint cores to review them.
Propose a final release for any deliverable that needs one. Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/761929
The release team will probably propose a placeholder patch to tag the stable branch for each deliverable as <release>-em (or if they haven’t gotten around to it yet, you can propose it yourself). Verify that the hash is at the current HEAD for each deliverable (it may have changed if some last-minute stuff was merged). Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/762372
After the “transition to EM” patch has merged, update the zuul jobs for the cinder-tempest-plugin. We always have 3 jobs for the active stable branches plus jobs for master. Add a new job for the most recent release and remove the job for the stable branch that just went to EM. Example patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/756330
Except where otherwise noted, this document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See all OpenStack Legal Documents.