13.1 Operational and Representation Aspects
Two kinds of aspects of entities
can be specified: representation aspects and operational aspects. Representation
aspects affect how the types and other entities of the language are to
be mapped onto the underlying machine. Operational aspects determine
other properties of entities.
Either kind of aspect of an entity may be specified
by means of an
aspect_specification
(see
13.1.1), which is an optional element
of most kinds of declarations and applies to the entity or entities being
declared. Aspects may also be specified by certain other constructs occurring
subsequent to the declaration of the affected entity: a representation
aspect value may be specified by means of a representation item and an
operational aspect value may be specified by means of an operational
item.
An operational item or a representation item applies
to an entity identified by a
local_name,
which denotes an entity declared local to the current declarative region,
or a library unit declared immediately preceding a representation pragma
in a
compilation.
Syntax
Name Resolution Rules
In an operational item or representation item, if
the
local_name
is a
direct_name,
then it shall resolve to denote a declaration (or, in the case of a
pragma,
one or more declarations) that occurs immediately within the same declarative
region as the item. If the
local_name
has an
attribute_designator,
then it shall resolve to denote an implementation-defined component (see
13.5.1) or a class-wide type implicitly
declared immediately within the same declarative region as the item.
A
local_name
that is a
library_unit_name
(only permitted in a representation pragma) shall resolve to denote the
library_item
that immediately precedes (except for other pragmas) the representation
pragma.
Legality Rules
The
representation
of an object consists of a certain number of bits (the
size of
the object). For an object of an elementary type, these are the bits
that are normally read or updated by the machine code when loading, storing,
or operating-on the value of the object. For an object of a composite
type, these are the bits reserved for this object, and include bits occupied
by subcomponents of the object. If the size of an object is greater than
that of its subtype, the additional bits are padding bits.
For
an elementary object, these padding bits are normally read and updated
along with the others. For a composite object, padding bits might not
be read or updated in any given composite operation, depending on the
implementation.
A
representation item
directly specifies a
representation aspect
of the entity denoted by the
local_name,
except in the case of a type-related representation item, whose
local_name
shall denote a first subtype, and which directly specifies an aspect
of the subtype's type.
A
representation item that names a subtype is either
subtype-specific
(Size and Alignment clauses) or
type-related (all others). Subtype-specific
aspects may differ for different subtypes of the same type.
An operational item
directly specifies an
operational aspect of the entity denoted by the
local_name,
except in the case of a type-related operational item, whose
local_name
shall denote a first subtype, and which directly specifies an aspect
of the type of the subtype.
A representation item that directly specifies an
aspect of a subtype or type shall appear after the type is completely
defined (see
3.11.1), and before the subtype
or type is frozen (see
13.14).
An operational item that directly specifies an aspect
of an entity shall appear before the entity is frozen (see
13.14).
If a representation item, operational item, or
aspect_specification
is given that directly specifies an aspect of an entity, then it is illegal
to give another representation item, operational item, or
aspect_specification
that directly specifies the same aspect of the entity.
Unless otherwise specified, it is illegal to specify
an operational or representation aspect of a generic formal parameter.
For an untagged derived type, it is illegal to specify
a type-related representation aspect if the parent type is a by-reference
type, or has any user-defined primitive subprograms. Similarly, it is
illegal to specify a nonconfirming type-related representation aspect
for an untagged by-reference type after one or more types have been derived
from it.
Operational and representation aspects of a generic
formal parameter are the same as those of the actual. Operational and
representation aspects are the same for all views of a type. Specification
of a type-related representation aspect is not allowed for a descendant
of a generic formal untagged type.
The specification of the Size aspect for a given
subtype, or the size or storage place for an object (including a component)
of a given subtype, shall allow for enough storage space to accommodate
any value of the subtype.
If a specification of a representation or operational
aspect is not supported by the implementation, it is illegal or raises
an exception at run time.
A
type_declaration
is illegal if it has one or more progenitors, and a nonconfirming value
was specified for a representation aspect of an ancestor, and this conflicts
with the representation of some other ancestor. The cases that cause
conflicts are implementation defined.
Static Semantics
If two subtypes statically match, then their subtype-specific
aspects (Size and Alignment) are the same.
A derived type inherits each type-related representation
aspect of its parent type that was directly specified before the declaration
of the derived type, or (in the case where the parent is derived) that
was inherited by the parent type from the grandparent type. A derived
subtype inherits each subtype-specific representation aspect of its parent
subtype that was directly specified before the declaration of the derived
type, or (in the case where the parent is derived) that was inherited
by the parent subtype from the grandparent subtype, but only if the parent
subtype statically matches the first subtype of the parent type. An inherited
representation aspect is overridden by a subsequent
aspect_specification
or representation item that specifies a different value for the same
aspect of the type or subtype.
In contrast, whether operational aspects are inherited
by a derived type depends on each specific aspect; unless specified,
an operational aspect is not inherited. When operational aspects are
inherited by a derived type, aspects that were directly specified by
aspect_specifications
or operational items that are visible at the point of the derived type
declaration, or (in the case where the parent is derived) that were inherited
by the parent type from the grandparent type are inherited. An inherited
operational aspect is overridden by a subsequent
aspect_specification
or operational item that specifies the same aspect of the type.
When an aspect that is a subprogram is inherited,
the derived type inherits the aspect in the same way that a derived type
inherits a user-defined primitive subprogram from its parent (see
3.4).
Each aspect of representation
of an entity is as follows:
If the aspect is
specified
for the entity, meaning that it is either directly specified or inherited,
then that aspect of the entity is as specified, except in the case of
Storage_Size, which specifies a minimum.
If an aspect of representation
of an entity is not specified, it is chosen by default in an unspecified
manner.
If an operational aspect is
specified for an entity (meaning that it is either directly specified
or inherited), then that aspect of the entity is as specified. Otherwise,
the aspect of the entity has the default value for that aspect.
An
aspect_specification
or representation item that specifies a representation aspect that would
have been chosen in the absence of the
aspect_specification
or representation item is said to be
confirming.
The aspect value specified in this case is said to be a
confirming
representation aspect value. Other values of the aspect are said to be
nonconfirming, as are the
aspect_specifications
and representation items that specified them.
Dynamic Semantics
For the elaboration of an
aspect_clause,
any evaluable constructs within it are evaluated.
Implementation Permissions
An implementation may interpret representation aspects
in an implementation-defined manner. An implementation may place implementation-defined
restrictions on the specification of representation aspects.
A
recommended level of support is defined for the specification
of representation aspects and related features in each subclause. These
recommendations are changed to requirements for implementations that
support the Systems Programming Annex (see
C.2,
“
Required Representation Support”).
Implementation Advice
The
recommended level of support for the specification of all representation
aspects is qualified as follows:
A confirming specification for a representation
aspect should be supported.
An implementation need not support the specification
for a representation aspect that contains nonstatic expressions, unless
each nonstatic expression is a
name
that statically denotes a constant declared before the entity.
An implementation need not support a specification
for the Size for a given composite subtype, nor the size or storage place
for an object (including a component) of a given composite subtype, unless
the constraints on the subtype and its composite subcomponents (if any)
are all static constraints.
An implementation need not support specifying a
nonconfirming representation aspect value if it could cause an aliased
object or an object of a by-reference type to be allocated at a nonaddressable
location or, when the alignment attribute of the subtype of such an object
is nonzero, at an address that is not an integral multiple of that alignment.
An implementation need not support specifying a
nonconfirming representation aspect value if it could cause an aliased
object of an elementary type to have a size other than that which would
have been chosen by default.
An implementation need not support specifying a
nonconfirming representation aspect value if it could cause an aliased
object of a composite type, or an object whose type is by-reference,
to have a size smaller than that which would have been chosen by default.
An implementation need not support specifying a
nonconfirming subtype-specific representation aspect value for an indefinite
or abstract subtype.
For purposes of these rules, the determination of
whether specifying a representation aspect value for a type could
cause an object to have some property is based solely on the properties
of the type itself, not on any available information about how the type
is used. In particular, it presumes that minimally aligned objects of
this type might be declared at some point.
1 Aspects that can be specified are defined
throughout this International Standard, and are summarized in
K.1.
Ada 2005 and 2012 Editions sponsored in part by Ada-Europe