3.6.3 String Types
Static Semantics
{string type}
A one-dimensional array type whose component type
is a character type is called a
string type.
{
AI95-00285-01}
[There are three predefined string types, String, Wide_String, and Wide_Wide_String,
each indexed by values of the predefined subtype Positive; these are
declared in the visible part of package Standard:]
[subtype Positive is Integer range 1 .. Integer'Last;
{
AI95-00285-01}
type String
is array(Positive
range <>)
of Character;
type Wide_String
is array(Positive
range <>)
of Wide_Character;
type Wide_Wide_String
is array(Positive
range <>)
of Wide_Wide_Character;
]
51 String literals (see
2.6
and
4.2) are defined for all string types.
The concatenation operator & is predefined for string types, as for
all nonlimited one-dimensional array types. The ordering operators <,
<=, >, and >= are predefined for string types, as for all one-dimensional
discrete array types; these ordering operators correspond to lexicographic
order (see
4.5.2).
Examples
Examples of string
objects:
Stars : String(1 .. 120) := (1 .. 120 => '*' );
Question : constant String := "How many characters?";
-- Question'First = 1, Question'Last = 20
-- Question'Length = 20 (the number of characters)
Ask_Twice : String := Question & Question; --
constrained to (1..40)
Ninety_Six :
constant Roman := "XCVI"; --
see 3.5.2 and 3.6Inconsistencies With Ada 83
{
inconsistencies with Ada 83}
The
declaration of Wide_String in Standard hides a use-visible declaration
with the same
defining_identifier.
In rare cases, this might result in an inconsistency between Ada 83 and
Ada 95.
Incompatibilities With Ada 83
{
incompatibilities with Ada 83}
Because
both String and Wide_String are always directly visible, an expression
like
"a" < "bc"
is now ambiguous, whereas in Ada 83 both string
literals could be resolved to type String.
Extensions to Ada 83
{
extensions to Ada 83}
The
type Wide_String is new (though it was approved by ARG for Ada 83 compilers
as well).
Wording Changes from Ada 83
We define the term string type as a natural
analogy to the term character type.
Inconsistencies With Ada 95
{
AI95-00285-01}
{
inconsistencies with Ada 95}
The declaration
of Wide_Wide_String in Standard hides a use-visible declaration with
the same
defining_identifier.
In the (very) unlikely event that an Ada 95 program had depended on such
a use-visible declaration, and the program remains legal after the substitution
of Standard.Wide_Wide_String, the meaning of the program will be different.
Extensions to Ada 95
{
AI95-00285-01}
{
extensions to Ada 95}
The type Wide_Wide_String
is new.
Sponsored by Ada-Europe