Demo of usage of the MultiGeometry class of pyFAI

For this tutorial, we will use the Jupyter notebook, formerly known as ipython, an take advantage of the integration of matplotlib.

[1]:
%matplotlib inline

import time
start_time = time.perf_counter()

import numpy
from matplotlib.pyplot import subplots

import pyFAI
from pyFAI.method_registry import IntegrationMethod
from pyFAI.gui import jupyter
print("Using pyFAI verison: ", pyFAI.version)
Using pyFAI verison:  0.20.0-beta1

The multi_geometry module of pyFAI allows you to integrate multiple images taken at various image position, all togeather. This tutorial will explain you how to perform azimuthal integration in three use-case: translation of the detector, rotation of the detector around the sample and finally how to fill gaps of a pixel detector. But before, we need to know how to generate fake diffraction image.

Generation of diffraction images

PyFAI knows about 20 different reference sample called calibrants. We will use them to generate fake diffraction images knowing the detector and its position in space

[2]:
import pyFAI.calibrant
print("Number of known calibrants: %s"%len(pyFAI.calibrant.ALL_CALIBRANTS))
print(", ".join(pyFAI.calibrant.ALL_CALIBRANTS.keys()))
Number of known calibrants: 29
mock, LaB6_SRM660a, cristobaltite, Al, Si_SRM640, Si_SRM640a, ZnO, LaB6, quartz, NaCl, Si_SRM640e, Pt, Si, LaB6_SRM660b, Cr2O3, AgBh, Ni, PBBA, Si_SRM640c, Au, CuO, CeO2, alpha_Al2O3, CrOx, Si_SRM640b, Si_SRM640d, C14H30O, TiO2, LaB6_SRM660c
[3]:
wavelength = 1e-10
LaB6 = pyFAI.calibrant.get_calibrant("LaB6")
LaB6.set_wavelength(wavelength)
print(LaB6)
print("Number of reflections for calibrant at given wavelength: %i"%len(LaB6.get_dSpacing()))
LaB6 Calibrant with 59 reflections at wavelength 1e-10
Number of reflections for calibrant at given wavelength: 59

We will start with a “simple” detector called Titan (build by Oxford Diffraction but now sold by Agilent). It is a CCD detector with scintilator and magnifying optics fibers. The pixel size is constant: 60µm

[4]:
import pyFAI.detectors
det = pyFAI.detectors.Titan()
print(det)
p1, p2, p3 = det.calc_cartesian_positions()
print("Detector is flat, P3= %s"%p3)
poni1 = p1.mean()
poni2 = p2.mean()
print("Center of the detector: poni1=%s poni2=%s"%(poni1, poni2))
Detector Titan 2k x 2k   PixelSize= 6.000e-05, 6.000e-05 m
Detector is flat, P3= None
Center of the detector: poni1=0.06144 poni2=0.06143988

The detector is placed orthogonal to the beam at 10cm. This geometry is saved into an AzimuthalIntegrator instance:

[5]:
from pyFAI.azimuthalIntegrator import AzimuthalIntegrator
ai = AzimuthalIntegrator(dist=0.1, poni1=poni1, poni2=poni2, detector=det, wavelength=wavelength)
print(ai)

#Selection of the methods for integrating
method = IntegrationMethod.parse("full", dim=1)
method2d = IntegrationMethod.select_one_available(("pseudo","histogram","cython"), dim=2)

print(f"Integration method in 1d: {method}\nIntegration method in 2d: {method2d}")
Detector Titan 2k x 2k   PixelSize= 6.000e-05, 6.000e-05 m
Wavelength= 1.000000e-10m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 6.144000e-02, 6.143988e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= 0.000000  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 100.000mm       Center: x=1023.998, y=1024.000 pix      Tilt=0.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= 0.000 deg
Integration method in 1d: IntegrationMethod(1d int, full split, histogram, cython)
Integration method in 2d: IntegrationMethod(2d int, pseudo split, histogram, cython)

Knowing the calibrant, the wavelength, the detector and the geometry, one can simulate the 2D diffraction pattern:

[6]:
img = LaB6.fake_calibration_image(ai)
jupyter.display(img, label="Simulated LaB6")
pass
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_10_0.png

This image can be integrated in q-space and plotted:

[7]:
jupyter.plot1d(ai.integrate1d(img, 1000, method=method))
pass
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_12_0.png

Note pyFAI does now about the ring position but nothing about relative intensities of rings.

Translation of the detector along the vertical axis

The vertical axis is defined along the poni1. If one moves the detector higher, the poni will appear at lower coordinates. So lets define 5 upwards verical translations of half the detector size.

For this we will duplicate 5x the AzimuthalIntegrator object, but instances of AzimuthalIntegrator are mutable, so it is important to create an actual copy and not an view on them. In Python, one can use the copy function of the copy module:

[8]:
import copy

We will now offset the poni1 value of each AzimuthalIntegratoe which correspond to a vertical translation. Each subsequent image is offsetted by half a detector width (stored as poni1).

[9]:
ais = []
imgs = []
fig, ax = subplots(1,5, figsize=(10,2))
for i in range(5):
    my_ai = copy.deepcopy(ai)
    my_ai.poni1 -= i*poni1
    my_img = LaB6.fake_calibration_image(my_ai)
    jupyter.display(my_img, label="poni$_1$=%3.1fmm"%(1e3*my_ai.poni1), ax=ax[i])
    ais.append(my_ai)
    imgs.append(my_img)
    print(my_ai)
Detector Titan 2k x 2k   PixelSize= 6.000e-05, 6.000e-05 m
Wavelength= 1.000000e-10m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 6.144000e-02, 6.143988e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= 0.000000  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 100.000mm       Center: x=1023.998, y=1024.000 pix      Tilt=0.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= 0.000 deg
Detector Titan 2k x 2k   PixelSize= 6.000e-05, 6.000e-05 m
Wavelength= 1.000000e-10m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 0.000000e+00, 6.143988e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= 0.000000  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 100.000mm       Center: x=1023.998, y=0.000 pix Tilt=0.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= 0.000 deg
Detector Titan 2k x 2k   PixelSize= 6.000e-05, 6.000e-05 m
Wavelength= 1.000000e-10m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= -6.144000e-02, 6.143988e-02m      rot1=0.000000  rot2= 0.000000  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 100.000mm       Center: x=1023.998, y=-1024.000 pix     Tilt=0.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= 0.000 deg
Detector Titan 2k x 2k   PixelSize= 6.000e-05, 6.000e-05 m
Wavelength= 1.000000e-10m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= -1.228800e-01, 6.143988e-02m      rot1=0.000000  rot2= 0.000000  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 100.000mm       Center: x=1023.998, y=-2048.000 pix     Tilt=0.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= 0.000 deg
Detector Titan 2k x 2k   PixelSize= 6.000e-05, 6.000e-05 m
Wavelength= 1.000000e-10m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= -1.843200e-01, 6.143988e-02m      rot1=0.000000  rot2= 0.000000  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 100.000mm       Center: x=1023.998, y=-3072.000 pix     Tilt=0.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= 0.000 deg
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_16_1.png

MultiGeometry integrator

The MultiGeometry instance can be created from any list of AzimuthalIntegrator instances or list of poni-files. Here we will use the former method.

The main difference of a MultiIntegrator with a “normal” AzimuthalIntegrator comes from the definition of the output space in the constructor of the object. One needs to specify the unit and the integration range.

[10]:
from pyFAI.multi_geometry import MultiGeometry
[11]:
mg = MultiGeometry(ais, unit="q_A^-1", radial_range=(0, 8))
print(mg)
MultiGeometry integrator with 5 geometries on (0, 8) radial range (q_A^-1) and (-180, 180) azimuthal range (deg)

MultiGeometry integrators can be used in a similar way to “normal” AzimuthalIntegrators. Keep in mind the output intensity is always scaled to absolute solid angle.

[12]:
ax = jupyter.plot1d(mg.integrate1d(imgs, 10000, method=method))
pass
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_21_0.png
[13]:
fig, ax = subplots()
for idx, (i, a)  in enumerate(zip(imgs, ais)):
    jupyter.plot1d(a.integrate1d(i, 1000, unit="q_A^-1", method=method), label="pos%i"%idx, ax=ax)
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_22_0.png

Rotation of the detector

The strength of translating the detector is that it simulates a larger detector, but this approach reaches its limit quikly as the higher the detector gets, the smallest the solid angle gets and induces artificial noise. One solution is to keep the detector at the same distance and rotate the detector.

This setup is common when mounting a detector on a goniometer.

Creation of diffraction images

In this example we will use a Pilatus 200k with 2 modules. It has a gap in the middle of the two detectors and we will see how the MultiGeometry can help.

As previously, we will use LaB6 but instead of translating the images, we will rotate them along the second axis:

[14]:
det = pyFAI.detectors.detector_factory("pilatus200k")
p1, p2, p3 = det.calc_cartesian_positions()
print(p3)
poni1 = p1.mean()
poni2 = p2.mean()
print(poni1)
print(poni2)
None
0.035002
0.04188201
[15]:
ai = AzimuthalIntegrator(dist=0.1, poni1=poni1, poni2=poni2, detector=det)
img = LaB6.fake_calibration_image(ai)

jupyter.display(img, label="Pilatus 200k with LaB$_6$")
pass
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_25_0.png
[16]:
jupyter.plot1d(ai.integrate1d(img, 500, unit="2th_deg", method=method))
pass
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_26_0.png

We will rotate the detector with a step size of 15 degrees

[17]:
step = 15*numpy.pi/180
ais = []
imgs = []
fig, ax = subplots(1, 5, figsize=(20,4))
for i in range(5):
    my_ai = copy.deepcopy(ai)
    my_ai.rot2 -= i*step
    my_img = LaB6.fake_calibration_image(my_ai)
    jupyter.display(my_img, label="Angle rot2: %.1f$^o$"%numpy.degrees(my_ai.rot2), ax=ax[i])
    ais.append(my_ai)
    imgs.append(my_img)
    print(my_ai)

Detector Pilatus 200k    PixelSize= 1.720e-04, 1.720e-04 m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 3.500200e-02, 4.188201e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= 0.000000  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 100.000mm       Center: x=243.500, y=203.500 pix        Tilt=0.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= 0.000 deg
Detector Pilatus 200k    PixelSize= 1.720e-04, 1.720e-04 m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 3.500200e-02, 4.188201e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= -0.261799  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 103.528mm       Center: x=243.500, y=47.716 pix Tilt=15.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= -90.000 deg
Detector Pilatus 200k    PixelSize= 1.720e-04, 1.720e-04 m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 3.500200e-02, 4.188201e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= -0.523599  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 115.470mm       Center: x=243.500, y=-132.169 pix       Tilt=30.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= -90.000 deg
Detector Pilatus 200k    PixelSize= 1.720e-04, 1.720e-04 m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 3.500200e-02, 4.188201e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= -0.785398  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 141.421mm       Center: x=243.500, y=-377.895 pix       Tilt=45.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= -90.000 deg
Detector Pilatus 200k    PixelSize= 1.720e-04, 1.720e-04 m
SampleDetDist= 1.000000e-01m    PONI= 3.500200e-02, 4.188201e-02m       rot1=0.000000  rot2= -1.047198  rot3= 0.000000 rad
DirectBeamDist= 200.000mm       Center: x=243.500, y=-803.506 pix       Tilt=60.000 deg  tiltPlanRotation= -90.000 deg
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_28_1.png
[18]:
fig, ax = subplots(figsize=(15,8))
for i, a in zip(imgs, ais):
    jupyter.plot1d(a.integrate1d(i, 1000, unit="2th_deg", method=method),
                   label="%.1f$^o$"%numpy.degrees(a.rot2), ax=ax)
pass
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_29_0.png

Creation of the MultiGeometry

This time we will work in 2theta angle using degrees:

[19]:
mg = MultiGeometry(ais, unit="2th_deg", radial_range=(0, 90))
print(mg)
fig, ax = subplots(2, 1, figsize=(12,16))
jupyter.plot1d(mg.integrate1d(imgs, 10000, method=method),
               ax=ax[0])
res2d = mg.integrate2d(imgs, 1000,360)
jupyter.plot2d(res2d, ax=ax[1])
pass
MultiGeometry integrator with 5 geometries on (0, 90) radial range (2th_deg) and (-180, 180) azimuthal range (deg)
area_pixel=1.3223150558322514 area_sum=2.694867349304461, Error= -1.0379918820544165
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_31_1.png

How to fill-up gaps in arrays of pixel detectors during 2D integration

We will use ImXpad detectors which exhibits large gaps.

[20]:
det = pyFAI.detectors.detector_factory("Xpad_flat")
p1, p2, p3 = det.calc_cartesian_positions()
print(p3)
poni1 = p1.mean()
poni2 = p2.mean()
print(poni1)
print(poni2)
None
0.074894994
0.03757
[21]:
ai = AzimuthalIntegrator(dist=0.1, poni1=0, poni2=poni2, detector=det)
img = LaB6.fake_calibration_image(ai)
jupyter.display(img, label="XPad S540 simulated LaB6")
jupyter.plot2d(ai.integrate2d_ng(img, 500, 360, azimuth_range=(0,180), unit="2th_deg", dummy=-1, method=method2d),
               label="2D")
pass
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_34_0.png
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_34_1.png

To observe textures, it is mandatory to fill the large empty space. This can be done by tilting the detector by a few degrees to higher 2theta angle (yaw 2x5deg) and turn the detector along the azimuthal angle (roll 2x5deg):

[22]:
step = 5*numpy.pi/180
nb_geom = 3
ais = []
imgs = []
for i in range(nb_geom):
    for j in range(nb_geom):
        my_ai = copy.deepcopy(ai)
        my_ai.rot2 -= i*step
        my_ai.rot3 -= j*step
        my_img = LaB6.fake_calibration_image(my_ai)
        ais.append(my_ai)
        imgs.append(my_img)
mg = MultiGeometry(ais, unit="2th_deg", radial_range=(0, 60), azimuth_range=(0, 180), empty=-5)
print(mg)
res2d = mg.integrate2d(imgs, 1000, 360, method=method2d)
jupyter.plot2d(res2d, label="Filled")
pass
MultiGeometry integrator with 9 geometries on (0, 60) radial range (2th_deg) and (0, 180) azimuthal range (deg)
../../../_images/usage_tutorial_MultiGeometry_MultiGeometry_36_1.png

As on can see, the gaps have disapeared and the statistics is much better, except on the border were only one image contributes to the integrated image.

Conclusion

The multi_geometry module of pyFAI makes powder diffraction experiments with small moving detectors much easier.

Some people would like to stitch input images together prior to integration. There are plenty of good tools to do this: generalist one like Photoshop or more specialized ones like AutoPano. More seriously this can be using the distortion module of a detector to re-sample the signal on a regular grid but one will have to store on one side the number of actual pixel contributing to a regular pixels and on the other the total intensity contained in the regularized pixel. Without the former information, doing science with a rebinned image is as meaningful as using Photoshop.

[23]:
print(f"Excution time: %.3f"%(time.perf_counter()-start_time))
Excution time: 18.016