| 💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✔️ PASS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 153 | 2009 | 109 | 1704 |
| 0% | 0% | 5% | 67% | 4% | 57% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
GF_TransLatin_Pinyin is almost fulfilled. Missing codepoints:
- 0x01F8 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x01F9 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH GRAVE)
- 0x207F (SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N)
- 0x030D (COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE)
- 0x0358 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT)
- 0x0114 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- 0x0115 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH BREVE)
- 0x012D (LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH BREVE)
- 0x014F (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH BREVE)
- And 0x1D3A (MODIFIER LETTER CAPITAL N)
[code: missing-codepoints]
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni0218 * ordmasculine * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute * Scircumflex * Scaron * S * ordfeminine and 3 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni0218 * ordmasculine * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute * Scircumflex * Scaron * S and 4 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 and 11 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni0218 * ordmasculine * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute * Scircumflex * Scaron * S * ordfeminine and 3 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni0218 * ordmasculine * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute * Scircumflex * Scaron and 5 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute * Scircumflex and 9 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 and 11 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 and 11 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 and 11 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * daggerdbl * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * dagger * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute and 10 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Following glyphs differ greatly from Google Fonts version: * paragraph * uni1E04 * uni0218 * ordmasculine * eth * degree * copyright * uni1E62 * Sacute * Scircumflex and 9 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i
- And i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni030C.alt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: registered Contours detected: 5 Expected: 3 or 4
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character (codepoint 0x00AD) which is supposed to be zero-width and invisible, and is used to mark a hyphenation possibility within a word in the absence of or overriding dictionary hyphenation. It is mostly an obsolete mechanism now, and the character is only included in fonts for legacy codepage coverage. [code: softhyphen]
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
- Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
- And Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<494.0,761.0>--<521.0,763.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<934.0,508.0>--<942.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1081.0,508.0>--<1082.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<862.0,0.0>--<859.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<711.0,0.0>--<711.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<922.0,508.0>--<923.0,508.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<805.0,517.0>--<805.0,519.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment L<<1090.0,928.0>--<1150.0,928.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<390.0,1400.0>--<416.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<1274.0,1400.0>--<1300.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<860.0,138.0>--<830.0,138.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<180.0,0.0>--<120.0,0.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment L<<20.0,1400.0>--<82.0,1400.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment L<<752.0,1400.0>--<800.0,1400.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment L<<1470.0,1400.0>--<1532.0,1400.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<496.0,722.0>--<524.0,722.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1038.0,1400.0>--<1098.0,1400.0>>
* And 29 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* f (U+0066) contains a short segment B<<512.5,1216.5>-<500.0,1224.0>-<488.0,1224.0>>
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment B<<654.0,331.5>-<650.0,309.0>-<648.0,300.0>>
* yen (U+00A5) contains a short segment L<<546.0,590.0>--<546.0,630.0>>
* yen (U+00A5) contains a short segment L<<846.0,630.0>--<846.0,590.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<590.0,840.0>--<614.0,844.0>>
* fi (U+FB01) contains a short segment B<<512.5,1216.5>-<500.0,1224.0>-<488.0,1224.0>>
* fl (U+FB02) contains a short segment B<<512.5,1216.5>-<500.0,1224.0>-<488.0,1224.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<914.0,512.0>--<914.0,514.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* registered (U+00AE) contains a short segment B<<339.0,1273.0>-<339.0,1273.0>-<338.5,1273.0>>
* registered (U+00AE) contains a short segment B<<338.5,1273.0>-<338.0,1273.0>-<335.0,1271.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<527.0,761.0>--<554.0,763.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1003.0,508.0>--<1011.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1003.0,0.0>--<1000.0,0.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<873.0,517.0>--<873.0,519.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<390.0,1400.0>--<441.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<1274.0,1400.0>--<1325.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<882.0,123.0>--<833.0,123.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<506.0,735.0>--<534.0,735.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1027.0,508.0>--<1029.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1027.0,0.0>--<1023.0,0.0>>
* uni1E3E (U+1E3E) contains a short segment L<<390.0,1400.0>--<441.0,1400.0>>
* uni1E3E (U+1E3E) contains a short segment L<<1274.0,1400.0>--<1325.0,1400.0>>
* uni1E3E (U+1E3E) contains a short segment L<<882.0,123.0>--<833.0,123.0>>
* uni1E40 (U+1E40) contains a short segment L<<390.0,1400.0>--<441.0,1400.0>>
* And 9 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<1213.0,362.0>-<1208.0,325.0>-<1227.0,302.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<1227.0,302.5>-<1246.0,280.0>-<1282.0,280.0>>
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment B<<281.0,432.0>-<280.0,439.0>-<278.0,446.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<542.0,812.0>--<567.0,816.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<883.0,471.0>--<888.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<888.0,508.0>--<906.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1150.0,508.0>--<1150.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<817.0,0.0>--<815.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<651.0,0.0>--<651.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<966.0,508.0>--<967.0,508.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<831.0,514.0>--<832.0,516.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment B<<630.5,313.5>-<621.0,287.0>-<613.0,276.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<581.0,828.0>--<605.0,832.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<959.0,508.0>--<964.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<943.0,0.0>--<942.0,0.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<908.0,513.0>--<908.0,515.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<557.0,828.0>--<581.0,832.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<890.0,508.0>--<895.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1171.0,508.0>--<1171.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<802.0,0.0>--<801.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<633.0,0.0>--<632.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<979.0,508.0>--<980.0,508.0>>
* florin (U+0192) contains a short segment B<<934.0,1216.0>-<932.0,1232.0>-<920.0,1240.0>>
* florin (U+0192) contains a short segment B<<920.0,1240.0>-<908.0,1248.0>-<893.0,1248.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<839.0,513.0>--<840.0,515.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<507.0,775.0>--<533.0,777.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<922.0,508.0>--<932.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1100.0,508.0>--<1100.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<850.0,0.0>--<847.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<695.0,0.0>--<695.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<934.0,508.0>--<935.0,508.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<812.0,516.0>--<812.0,518.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment L<<1080.0,928.0>--<1140.0,928.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<446.0,1400.0>--<472.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<1330.0,1400.0>--<1356.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<1431.0,0.0>--<1369.0,0.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<739.0,138.0>--<709.0,138.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<39.0,0.0>--<-21.0,0.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment L<<76.0,1400.0>--<138.0,1400.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment L<<808.0,1400.0>--<856.0,1400.0>>
* W (U+0057) contains a short segment L<<1526.0,1400.0>--<1588.0,1400.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<457.0,722.0>--<485.0,722.0>>
* And 35 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<446.0,1400.0>--<497.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<1330.0,1400.0>--<1381.0,1400.0>>
* M (U+004D) contains a short segment L<<759.0,123.0>--<710.0,123.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<469.0,735.0>--<497.0,735.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<958.0,508.0>--<960.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1046.0,508.0>--<1046.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<886.0,0.0>--<882.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<743.0,0.0>--<742.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<900.0,508.0>--<900.0,508.0>>
* uni1E3E (U+1E3E) contains a short segment L<<446.0,1400.0>--<497.0,1400.0>>
* And 11 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<515.0,745.0>--<542.0,747.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1017.0,508.0>--<1022.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1017.0,0.0>--<1014.0,0.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<865.0,518.0>--<865.0,520.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment B<<288.0,406.0>-<287.0,427.0>-<282.0,447.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<525.0,795.0>--<551.0,797.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<904.0,508.0>--<919.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1126.0,508.0>--<1127.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<832.0,0.0>--<830.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<672.0,0.0>--<671.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<951.0,508.0>--<951.0,508.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<822.0,515.0>--<822.0,517.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment B<<371.0,406.0>-<367.0,427.0>-<359.0,447.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<554.0,795.0>--<580.0,797.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<973.0,508.0>--<988.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<973.0,0.0>--<971.0,0.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<890.0,515.0>--<890.0,517.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<1302.0,362.0>-<1302.0,325.0>-<1324.5,302.5>>
* at (U+0040) contains a short segment B<<1324.5,302.5>-<1347.0,280.0>-<1383.0,280.0>>
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment B<<360.0,432.0>-<358.0,439.0>-<356.0,446.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<568.0,812.0>--<593.0,816.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<957.0,471.0>--<957.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<957.0,508.0>--<975.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<957.0,0.0>--<956.0,0.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<900.0,514.0>--<900.0,516.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* f (U+0066) contains a short segment B<<557.0,1194.0>-<554.0,1209.0>-<542.5,1216.5>>
* f (U+0066) contains a short segment B<<542.5,1216.5>-<531.0,1224.0>-<519.0,1224.0>>
* sterling (U+00A3) contains a short segment B<<559.5,331.5>-<552.0,309.0>-<550.0,300.0>>
* yen (U+00A5) contains a short segment L<<488.0,590.0>--<494.0,630.0>>
* yen (U+00A5) contains a short segment L<<794.0,630.0>--<788.0,590.0>>
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<568.0,840.0>--<592.0,844.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1186.0,508.0>--<1187.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<792.0,0.0>--<791.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<619.0,0.0>--<618.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<990.0,508.0>--<990.0,508.0>>
* And 9 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<538.0,775.0>--<565.0,777.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<991.0,508.0>--<1001.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<991.0,0.0>--<988.0,0.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<880.0,516.0>--<880.0,518.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have segments which seem very short:
* germandbls (U+00DF) contains a short segment L<<479.0,745.0>--<507.0,747.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<948.0,508.0>--<953.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<1060.0,508.0>--<1061.0,508.0>>
* Eng (U+014A) contains a short segment L<<876.0,0.0>--<873.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<730.0,0.0>--<729.0,0.0>>
* eng (U+014B) contains a short segment L<<909.0,508.0>--<909.0,508.0>>
* And uniFFFD (U+FFFD) contains a short segment L<<797.0,518.0>--<797.0,520.0>> [code: found-short-segments]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* four (U+0034): L<<156.0,498.0>--<690.0,494.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<690.0,494.0>--<686.0,1302.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<276.0,0.0>--<278.0,940.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<278.0,1000.0>--<276.0,1314.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<336.0,1314.0>--<338.0,1000.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<338.0,940.0>--<336.0,0.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<276.0,0.0>--<278.0,940.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<278.0,1000.0>--<276.0,1314.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<336.0,1314.0>--<338.0,1000.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<338.0,940.0>--<336.0,0.0>>
* And 16 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* eng (U+014B): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1000.0>>
* eth (U+00F0): L<<340.0,1240.0>--<338.0,1540.0>>
* h (U+0068): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1500.0>>
* h (U+0068): L<<420.0,1500.0>--<421.0,937.0>>
* hbar (U+0127): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1042.0>>
* hcircumflex (U+0125): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1500.0>>
* hcircumflex (U+0125): L<<420.0,1500.0>--<421.0,937.0>>
* n (U+006E): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1000.0>>
* nacute (U+0144): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1000.0>>
* ncaron (U+0148): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1000.0>>
* And 29 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* five (U+0035): L<<341.0,892.0>--<504.0,891.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<246.0,535.0>--<684.0,533.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<684.0,533.0>--<681.0,1200.0>>
* registered (U+00AE): L<<323.0,906.0>--<324.0,1264.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<251.0,0.0>--<252.0,860.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<252.0,1000.0>--<251.0,1314.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<391.0,1314.0>--<392.0,1000.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<392.0,860.0>--<391.0,0.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<251.0,0.0>--<252.0,860.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<252.0,1000.0>--<251.0,1314.0>>
* And 52 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* four (U+0034): L<<185.0,510.0>--<688.0,507.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<688.0,507.0>--<684.0,1269.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<268.0,0.0>--<270.0,914.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<270.0,1000.0>--<268.0,1314.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<354.0,1314.0>--<356.0,1000.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<356.0,914.0>--<354.0,0.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<268.0,0.0>--<270.0,914.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<270.0,1000.0>--<268.0,1314.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<354.0,1314.0>--<356.0,1000.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<356.0,914.0>--<354.0,0.0>>
* And 16 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* eng (U+014B): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1000.0>>
* eth (U+00F0): L<<342.0,1258.0>--<340.0,1534.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<399.0,599.0>--<674.0,598.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<674.0,598.0>--<673.0,1027.0>>
* h (U+0068): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1500.0>>
* h (U+0068): L<<396.0,1500.0>--<397.0,926.0>>
* hbar (U+0127): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1058.0>>
* hcircumflex (U+0125): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1500.0>>
* hcircumflex (U+0125): L<<396.0,1500.0>--<397.0,926.0>>
* n (U+006E): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1000.0>>
* And 31 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* four (U+0034): L<<210.0,520.0>--<686.0,517.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<686.0,517.0>--<683.0,1241.0>>
* registered (U+00AE): L<<317.0,909.0>--<318.0,1268.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<261.0,0.0>--<262.0,892.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<262.0,1000.0>--<261.0,1314.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<369.0,1314.0>--<370.0,1000.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<370.0,892.0>--<369.0,0.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<261.0,0.0>--<262.0,892.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<262.0,1000.0>--<261.0,1314.0>>
* tcaron (U+0165): L<<369.0,1314.0>--<370.0,1000.0>>
* And 17 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* Euro (U+20AC): L<<459.0,758.0>--<460.0,640.0>>
* approxequal (U+2248): L<<248.0,202.0>--<45.0,201.0>>
* approxequal (U+2248): L<<248.0,750.0>--<45.0,749.0>>
* asciitilde (U+007E): L<<288.0,462.0>--<85.0,461.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<323.0,567.0>--<679.0,566.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<679.0,566.0>--<677.0,1113.0>>
* registered (U+00AE): L<<336.0,908.0>--<337.0,1252.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<229.0,0.0>--<230.0,792.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<230.0,1000.0>--<229.0,1314.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<437.0,1314.0>--<438.0,1000.0>>
* And 38 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* approxequal (U+2248): L<<941.0,1020.0>--<1181.0,1018.0>>
* approxequal (U+2248): L<<941.0,472.0>--<1181.0,470.0>>
* asciitilde (U+007E): L<<981.0,738.0>--<1221.0,736.0>>
* eng (U+014B): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1000.0>>
* eth (U+00F0): L<<345.0,1282.0>--<343.0,1526.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<363.0,584.0>--<676.0,583.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<676.0,583.0>--<675.0,1067.0>>
* h (U+0068): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1500.0>>
* h (U+0068): L<<364.0,1500.0>--<365.0,911.0>>
* hbar (U+0127): L<<121.0,0.0>--<120.0,1079.0>>
* And 35 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]
The following glyphs have semi-vertical/semi-horizontal lines:
* eth (U+00F0): L<<351.0,1338.0>--<350.0,1506.0>>
* five (U+0035): L<<370.0,904.0>--<515.0,903.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<278.0,548.0>--<682.0,546.0>>
* four (U+0034): L<<682.0,546.0>--<679.0,1164.0>>
* partialdiff (U+2202): L<<351.0,1338.0>--<350.0,1506.0>>
* registered (U+00AE): L<<328.0,908.0>--<329.0,1250.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<242.0,0.0>--<243.0,832.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<243.0,1000.0>--<242.0,1314.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<410.0,1314.0>--<411.0,1000.0>>
* t (U+0074): L<<411.0,832.0>--<410.0,0.0>>
* And 54 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-semi-vertical]